BACKGROUND: So far, research on the patients' perspective on fertility care has mainly focused on women. Our primary aim was to explore what is important to men with respect to care related to testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and to identify strengths and weaknesses of that care. METHODS: This was a mixed-method study including phenomenology on interviews with 17 'interview participants' (a purposive sample with diversification for the TESE result) who received a TESE treatment at a tertiary university clinic. Strengths and weaknesses of our TESE-related quality of care were identified. Additionally, a telephone questionnaire was answered by 15 'rating participants' not willing to be interviewed and the questionnaire was analyzed quantitatively. RESULTS: Interview participants wanted more than effective treatment and attached importance to the attitude of fertility clinic staff, information, time flow, personalized care, 'all that is necessary', coaching, a homely atmosphere, continuity, privacy and separate accommodation. The satisfaction of rating participants (independent of the TESE result) was problematic for 'overall experience', 'physician at the day clinic' and 'gynecologist at discussion of the result'. The attitude of fertility clinic staff and information were the most obvious strengths of our TESE-related care. Weaknesses were lack of practical information on post-surgical recovery and waiting times in the waiting room. CONCLUSIONS: TESE patients focus not only on clinical effectiveness but also on patient-centeredness of care, and this has led to organizational changes and a new patient information brochure in our center. Qualitative research is useful to examine, understand and improve the patient-centeredness of care.
BACKGROUND: So far, research on the patients' perspective on fertility care has mainly focused on women. Our primary aim was to explore what is important to men with respect to care related to testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and to identify strengths and weaknesses of that care. METHODS: This was a mixed-method study including phenomenology on interviews with 17 'interview participants' (a purposive sample with diversification for the TESE result) who received a TESE treatment at a tertiary university clinic. Strengths and weaknesses of our TESE-related quality of care were identified. Additionally, a telephone questionnaire was answered by 15 'rating participants' not willing to be interviewed and the questionnaire was analyzed quantitatively. RESULTS: Interview participants wanted more than effective treatment and attached importance to the attitude of fertility clinic staff, information, time flow, personalized care, 'all that is necessary', coaching, a homely atmosphere, continuity, privacy and separate accommodation. The satisfaction of rating participants (independent of the TESE result) was problematic for 'overall experience', 'physician at the day clinic' and 'gynecologist at discussion of the result'. The attitude of fertility clinic staff and information were the most obvious strengths of our TESE-related care. Weaknesses were lack of practical information on post-surgical recovery and waiting times in the waiting room. CONCLUSIONS: TESE patients focus not only on clinical effectiveness but also on patient-centeredness of care, and this has led to organizational changes and a new patient information brochure in our center. Qualitative research is useful to examine, understand and improve the patient-centeredness of care.
Authors: Eva W Verkerk; Ester A Rake; Didi D M Braat; Willianne L D M Nelen; Johanna W M Aarts; Jan A M Kremer Journal: Health Expect Date: 2022-02-26 Impact factor: 3.318
Authors: Felicia Dreischor; Ellen T M Laan; Fleur Peeters; Karen Peeraer; Cornelis B Lambalk; Mariëtte Goddijn; Inge M Custers; Eline A F Dancet Journal: Hum Reprod Open Date: 2022-09-15