Literature DB >> 20875952

Does a waist-worn accelerometer capture intra- and inter-person variation in walking behavior among persons with multiple sclerosis?

Robert W Motl1, Jacob J Sosnoff, Deirdre Dlugonski, Yoojin Suh, Myla Goldman.   

Abstract

The valid application of accelerometry and interpretation of its output (i.e., counts per unit time) for the measurement of walking behavior in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) rests upon multiple untested assumptions. This study tested the assumption that a waist-worn accelerometer should capture the intra- and inter-person variation in walking behavior. Twenty-four participants with a neurologist-confirmed diagnosis of MS and who were ambulatory with minimal assistance undertook three 6-min periods of over-ground walking that involved comfortable (CWS) and then slower (SWS) and faster (FWS) walking speeds while wearing ActiGraph, model 7164, accelerometers around the waist and ankle. The experimental manipulation of walking was successful such that the CWS was 76.7±13.0m/min (range=55.6-105.14), whereas the SWS and FWS were 64.3±12.3m/min (range=44.5-90.1) and 89.1±13.8m/min (range=60.9-116.4), respectively. Movement counts from the waist and ankle-worn accelerometer were strongly associated with the manipulation of speed, but the association was stronger for the waist than ankle based on both eta-squared estimates (η(2) values=.78 and .46) and the average squared multiple correlations from individual regression analyses (R(2) values=.97±.04 and .88±.21). The bivariate correlation between movement counts from the waist-worn accelerometer and speed of walking (r=.823, p=.001) was large in magnitude and significantly different (z=3.22, p=.001) from that between movement counts from the ankle-worn unit and walking speed (r=.549, p=.001). This study provides novel evidence that an accelerometer worn around the waist captures intra- and inter-person variation in over-ground walking behavior in those with MS.
Copyright © 2010 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20875952      PMCID: PMC3165016          DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  13 in total

1.  Technical reliability of the CSA activity monitor: The EarlyBird Study.

Authors:  Brad S Metcalf; John S H Curnow; Colin Evans; Linda D Voss; Terence J Wilkin
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Persistent pain and uncomfortable sensations in persons with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Olympia Hadjimichael; Robert D Kerns; Marco A Rizzo; Gary Cutter; Timothy Vollmer
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Actigraphic investigations on the activity-rest behavior of right- and left-handed students.

Authors:  Hanna Lehnkering; Andreas Strauss; Brigitte Wegner; Renate Siegmund
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Possible clinical outcome measures for clinical trials in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Myla D Goldman; Robert W Motl; Richard A Rudick
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.570

5.  Predicting habitual walking performance in multiple sclerosis: relevance of capacity and self-report measures.

Authors:  Domien Gijbels; Geert Alders; Elke Van Hoof; Caroline Charlier; Machteld Roelants; Tom Broekmans; Bert Op 't Eijnde; Peter Feys
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Continued validation of the Symptom Inventory in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Robert W Motl; Carolyn E Schwartz; Timothy Vollmer
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.181

7.  Confirmation and extension of the validity of the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12).

Authors:  Robert W Motl; Erin M Snook
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.181

8.  Accelerometry in persons with multiple sclerosis: measurement of physical activity or walking mobility?

Authors:  Madeline Weikert; Robert W Motl; Yoojin Suh; Edward McAuley; Daniel Wynn
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.181

9.  Exploring actical accelerometers as an objective measure of physical activity in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Nicola M Kayes; Philip J Schluter; Kathryn M McPherson; Marta Leete; Grant Mawston; Denise Taylor
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Physical activity correlates with neurological impairment and disability in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Robert W Motl; Erin M Snook; Daniel R Wynn; Timothy Vollmer
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.254

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Motion sensors in multiple sclerosis: Narrative review and update of applications.

Authors:  Jeffer Eidi Sasaki; Brian Sandroff; Marcas Bamman; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  Home-based system for physical activity monitoring in patients with multiple sclerosis (Pilot study).

Authors:  Layal Shammas; Tom Zentek; Birte von Haaren; Stefan Schlesinger; Stefan Hey; Asarnusch Rashid
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 3.  Pedometers and Accelerometers in Multiple Sclerosis: Current and New Applications.

Authors:  Jeffer Eidi Sasaki; Gabriel Felipe Arantes Bertochi; Joilson Meneguci; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Gait variability and multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Michael J Socie; Jacob J Sosnoff
Journal:  Mult Scler Int       Date:  2013-03-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.