Literature DB >> 20875758

Evaluation of alveolar socket response to Angelus MTA and experimental light-cure MTA.

João Eduardo Gomes-Filho1, Mariana Teixeira de Moraes Costa, Luciano Tavares Ângelo Cintra, Carolina Simonetti Lodi, Paulo Carvalo Tobias Duarte, Roberta Okamoto, Pedro Felício Estrada Bernabé, Mauro Juvenal Nery, Mark Cannon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rat alveolar socket response to implanted polyethylene tubes filled with a light-cured MTA or Angelus MTA. STUDY
DESIGN: Fifty-seven Wistar rats received an implant filled with one of the materials in the dental socket of the right central incisor. After 30, 60, and 90 days, animals were killed, and the right hemimaxillas were removed and processed to be analyzed on light microscopy. After embedding in paraffin, 6-μm-thick sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the reaction were performed.
RESULTS: It was observed that the light-cured MTA presented a similar response compared with Angelus MTA, characterized by the reduction of the chronic inflammatory response and organization of the alveolar bone close to the materials, especially at the 90th day of observation.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that both materials were well accepted by the alveolar tissue of rats, with the formation of mineralized tissue close to the materials.
Copyright © 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20875758     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.05.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biocompatibility of root-end filling materials: recent update.

Authors:  Payal Saxena; Saurabh Kumar Gupta; Vilas Newaskar
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-08-23

2.  Comparison of the performance of natural latex membranes prepared with different procedures and PTFE membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR) in rabbits.

Authors:  Jonas M L Moura; Juliana F Ferreira; Leonardo Marques; Leandro Holgado; Carlos F O Graeff; Angela Kinoshita
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  A review of the bioactivity of hydraulic calcium silicate cements.

Authors:  Li-Na Niu; Kai Jiao; Tian-da Wang; Wei Zhang; Josette Camilleri; Brian E Bergeron; Hai-Lan Feng; Jing Mao; Ji-Hua Chen; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and CD5 immunolabeling of new experimental endodontic sealer and repair material.

Authors:  Francine Benetti; Luciana Louzada Ferreira; Alexandre Henrique Dos Reis-Prado; Flávio Duarte Faria; Edilson Ervolino; Fabio Luiz Camargo Vellela Berbert; Renato de Toledo Leonardo; João Dias; João Eduardo Gomes-Filho; Luciano Tavares Angelo Cintra
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 5.  Mineral Trioxide Aggregate-A Review of Properties and Testing Methodologies.

Authors:  William N Ha; Timothy Nicholson; Bill Kahler; Laurence J Walsh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Endodontic Management of Open Apex Teeth Using Lyophilized Collagen Sponge and MTA Cement: Report of Two Cases.

Authors:  Miriam Graziele Magro; Milton Carlos Kuga; Weber Adad Ricci; Kátia Cristina Keine; Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto; Suellen Linares Lima; Alvaro Henrique Borges; Lauriê Garcia Belizário; Matheus Coêlho Bandeca
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2017
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.