Literature DB >> 20875713

Revision of the venous clinical severity score: venous outcomes consensus statement: special communication of the American Venous Forum Ad Hoc Outcomes Working Group.

Michael A Vasquez1, Eberhard Rabe, Robert B McLafferty, Cynthia K Shortell, William A Marston, David Gillespie, Mark H Meissner, Robert B Rutherford.   

Abstract

In response to the need for a disease severity measurement, the American Venous Forum committee on outcomes assessment developed the Venous Severity Scoring system in 2000. There are three components of this scoring system, the Venous Disability Score, the Venous Segmental Disease Score, and the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). The VCSS was developed from elements of the CEAP classification (clinical grade, etiology, anatomy, pathophysiology), which is the worldwide standard for describing the clinical features of chronic venous disease. However, as a descriptive instrument, the CEAP classification responds poorly to change. The VCSS was subsequently developed as an evaluative instrument that would be responsive to changes in disease severity over time and in response to treatment. Based on initial experiences with the VCSS, an international ad hoc working group of the American Venous Forum was charged with updating the instrument. This revision of the VCSS is focused on clarifying ambiguities, updating terminology, and simplifying application. The specific language of proven quality-of-life instruments was used to better address the issues of patients at the lower end of the venous disease spectrum. Periodic review and revision are necessary for generating more universal applicability and for comparing treatment outcomes in a meaningful way.
Copyright © 2010 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20875713     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  37 in total

Review 1.  Medical Treatment for Postthrombotic Syndrome.

Authors:  Federico Silva Palacios; Suman Wasan Rathbun
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Socio-economic impact of endovenous thermal ablation techniques.

Authors:  Damian Kelleher; Tristan R A Lane; Ian J Franklin; Alun H Davies
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Multifaceted management of the postthrombotic syndrome.

Authors:  Lina Nayak; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Endovascular therapy for advanced post-thrombotic syndrome: Proceedings from a multidisciplinary consensus panel.

Authors:  Suresh Vedantham; Susan R Kahn; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Anthony J Comerota; Sameer Parpia; Sreelatha Meleth; Diane Earp; Rick Williams; Akhilesh K Sista; William Marston; Suman Rathbun; Elizabeth A Magnuson; Mahmood K Razavi; Michael R Jaff; Clive Kearon
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.239

5.  Endovascular Thrombus Removal for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Anthony J Comerota; Clive Kearon; Chu-Shu Gu; Jim A Julian; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Susan R Kahn; Michael R Jaff; Mahmood K Razavi; Andrei L Kindzelski; Riyaz Bashir; Parag Patel; Mel Sharafuddin; Michael J Sichlau; Wael E Saad; Zakaria Assi; Lawrence V Hofmann; Margaret Kennedy; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Correlation between Post-Procedure Residual Thrombus and Clinical Outcome in Deep Vein Thrombosis Patients Receiving Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis in a Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mahmood K Razavi; Amber Salter; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Samantha Lancia; Susan R Kahn; Ido Weinberg; Clive Kearon; Ezana M Azene; Nilesh H Patel; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Age is not a barrier to good outcomes after varicose vein procedures.

Authors:  Danielle C Sutzko; Elizabeth A Andraska; Andrea T Obi; Mikel Sadek; Lowell S Kabnick; Thomas W Wakefield; Nicholas H Osborne
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2017-09

8.  Relationships between the use of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis, sonographic findings, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute proximal DVT: Results from the ATTRACT Multicenter Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Ido Weinberg; Suresh Vedantham; Amber Salter; Gail Hadley; Noor Al-Hammadi; Clive Kearon; Jim A Julian; Mahmood K Razavi; Heather L Gornik; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Anthony J Comerota; Andrei L Kindzelski; Robert M Schainfeld; John F Angle; Sanjay Misra; Jonathan A Schor; Darren Hurst; Michael R Jaff
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 9.  Incidence and interventions for post-thrombotic syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Farrell; Christopher Sutter; Sidhartha Tavri; Indravadan Patel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

Review 10.  Phlebotonics for venous insufficiency.

Authors:  Maria José Martinez-Zapata; Robin W M Vernooij; Sonia Maria Uriona Tuma; Airton T Stein; Rosa M Moreno; Emilio Vargas; Dolors Capellà; Xavier Bonfill Cosp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.