Literature DB >> 20875548

Can we and should we improve on frontline imatinib therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia?

Carmen Fava1, Giuseppe Saglio.   

Abstract

Although imatinib is presently the treatment of choice in newly diagnosed chronic-phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, 8 years from start of the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS) trial, 45% of the patients originally enrolled in the imatinib arm (imatinib 400 mg/d) have discontinued this treatment; in 15% of the cases this was due to lack of efficacy and in 5% for safety or intolerance problems. With the aim of improving the results of the standard imatinib 400 mg/d first-line therapy of CML, several trials have been started and are presently ongoing. The purpose of these trials is to test the efficacy of higher dosages of imatinib and of imatinib in combination with other agents, in particular with interferon alpha (IFN). In addition, second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which are now available for treatment of patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib, also have been tested for first-line treatment, in the setting of both single-center and multicenter studies. The results of these trials seem to indicate a superior efficacy of the more potent second-generation TKIs with respect to imatinib, particularly in terms of higher rates of complete cytogenetic responses (CCyR) and of major molecular responses (MMR), that, more importantly, also seem to lead to a decreased number of progressions of the disease. Although these results still need to be fully evaluated after a longer period of follow-up, the use of next-generation agents and modified imatinib-based strategies in the first-line therapy of CML is likely to become a key area of clinical research during the next few years.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20875548     DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2010.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hematol        ISSN: 0037-1963            Impact factor:   3.851


  5 in total

Review 1.  Selection of therapy: rational decisions based on molecular events.

Authors:  Jamshid S Khorashad; Michael W N Deininger
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.722

2.  shRNA library screening identifies nucleocytoplasmic transport as a mediator of BCR-ABL1 kinase-independent resistance.

Authors:  Jamshid S Khorashad; Anna M Eiring; Clinton C Mason; Kevin C Gantz; Amber D Bowler; Hannah M Redwine; Fan Yu; Ira L Kraft; Anthony D Pomicter; Kimberly R Reynolds; Anthony J Iovino; Matthew S Zabriskie; William L Heaton; Srinivas K Tantravahi; Michael Kauffman; Sharon Shacham; Alex Chenchik; Kyle Bonneau; Katharine S Ullman; Thomas O'Hare; Michael W Deininger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Milestones and monitoring.

Authors:  Alessandro Morotti; Carmen Fava; Giuseppe Saglio
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.952

4.  The effects of time valuation in cancer optimal therapies: a study of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Pedro José Gutiérrez-Diez; Miguel Ángel López-Marcos; Julia Martínez-Rodríguez; Jose Russo
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.432

5.  Imatinib resistance: a review of alternative inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Roberta Bitencourt; Ilana Zalcberg; Iúri Drumond Louro
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2011
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.