Literature DB >> 20874502

Carbon footprinting of North American emergency medical services systems.

Ian E Blanchard1, Lawrence H Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to characterize the carbon emissions from a broad sample of North American emergency medical services (EMS) agencies, and to begin the process of establishing voluntary EMS-related emission targets.
METHODS: Fifteen diverse North American EMS systems with more than 550,000 combined annual responses and serving a population of 6.3 million reported their direct and purchased ("Tier 2") energy consumption for one year. We calculated total carbon dioxide equivalent (CO(2)e) emissions using Environmental Protection Agency, Energy Information Administration, and locality-specific emission conversion factors. We also calculated per-response and population-based emissions. We report descriptive summary data.
RESULTS: Participants included government "third-service" (n = 4), public utility model (n = 1), private contractor (n = 6), and rural rescue squad (n = 4) systems. Call volumes ranged from 800 to 114,280 (median 20,093; interquartile range [IQR] 1,100-55,217). Emissions totaled 46,941,690 pounds of CO(2)e (21,289 metric tons); 75% of emissions were from diesel or gasoline. For systems providing complete Tier 2 data, median emissions per response were 80.7 (IQR 65.1-106.5) pounds of CO(2)e and median emissions per service-area resident were 7.8 (IQR 4.7-11.2) pounds of CO(2)e. Two systems reported aviation fuel consumption for air medical services, with emissions of 2,395 pounds of CO(2)e per flight, or 0.7 pounds of CO(2)e per service-area resident.
CONCLUSION: EMS operations produce substantial carbon emissions, primarily from vehicle-related fuel consumption. The 75th percentiles from our data suggest 106.5 pounds of CO(2)e per unit response and/or 11.2 pounds of CO(2)e per service-area resident as preliminary maximum emission targets. Air medical services can anticipate higher per-flight but lower population-based emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20874502     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2010.519818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  4 in total

1.  Petroleum and health care: evaluating and managing health care's vulnerability to petroleum supply shifts.

Authors:  Jeremy Hess; Daniel Bednarz; Jaeyong Bae; Jessica Pierce
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  The energy burden and environmental impact of health services.

Authors:  Lawrence H Brown; Petra G Buettner; Deon V Canyon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The US Health Care Sector's Carbon Footprint: Stomping or Treading Lightly?

Authors:  Howard Frumkin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Environmental Sustainability in Respiratory Care: An Overview of the healthCARe-Based envirONmental Cost of Treatment (CARBON) Programme.

Authors:  Alex Wilkinson; Ekaterina Maslova; Christer Janson; Yang Xu; John Haughney; Jennifer K Quint; Nigel Budgen; Andrew Menzies-Gow; John Bell; Michael G Crooks
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 4.070

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.