Literature DB >> 20873934

The negation bias: when negations signal stereotypic expectancies.

Camiel J Beukeboom1, Catrin Finkenauer, Daniël H J Wigboldus.   

Abstract

Research on linguistic biases shows that stereotypic expectancies are implicitly reflected in language and are thereby subtly communicated to message recipients. We examined whether these findings extend to the use of negations (e.g., not smart instead of stupid). We hypothesized that people use more negations in descriptions of stereotype-inconsistent behavior than in descriptions of stereotype-consistent behavior. In 3 studies, participants either judged the applicability of experimentally controlled person descriptions or spontaneously produced person descriptions themselves. Results provided support for this hypothesis. Moreover, a 4th study demonstrated that negations have communicative consequences. When a target person's behavior was described with negations, message recipients inferred that this behavior was an exception to the rule and that it was more likely caused by situational circumstances than by dispositional factors. These findings indicate that by using negations people implicitly communicate stereotypic expectancies and that negations play a subtle but powerful role in stereotype maintenance. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20873934     DOI: 10.1037/a0020861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  5 in total

1.  An inconclusive study comparing the effect of concrete and abstract descriptions of belief-inconsistent information.

Authors:  Katherine A Collins; Richard Clément
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Engaging Gatekeepers, Optimizing Decision Making, and Mitigating Bias: Design Specifications for Systemic Diversity Interventions.

Authors:  Claartje J Vinkenburg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Sci       Date:  2017-04-07

3.  Verbal Descriptions Accompanying Numeric Information About the Risk: The Valence of Message and Linguistic Polarity.

Authors:  Agnieszka Olchowska-Kotala
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-12

4.  Coding linguistic elements in clinical interactions: a step-by-step guide for analyzing communication form.

Authors:  Inge Stortenbeker; Lisa Salm; Tim Olde Hartman; Wyke Stommel; Enny Das; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.612

Review 5.  Cross-linguistic evidence for gender as a prominence feature.

Authors:  Yulia Esaulova; Lisa von Stockhausen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.