Marcia Tummers1, Hans Knoop, Gijs Bleijenberg. 1. Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Expert Centre for Chronic Fatigue, 4628, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. m.tummers@nkcv.umcn.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this randomized noninferiority study, the effectiveness and efficiency of stepped care for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) was compared to care as usual. Stepped care was formed by guided self-instruction, followed by cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) if the patient desired it. Care as usual encompassed CBT after a waiting period. METHOD: A total of 171 CFS patients were randomly allocated to stepped care or care as usual. Patients in both conditions were assessed 3 times: at baseline, after guided self-instruction or the waiting period, and after CBT. The primary outcome variables were fatigue severity (Checklist Individual Strength) and disabilities (Sickness Impact Profile and Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36). RESULTS: An intention to treat analysis showed that stepped care (N = 84) for CFS is noninferior to care as usual (N = 85). Both conditions were equivalent in reducing fatigue severity, reducing disabilities, and increasing physical functioning. The treatment results of both conditions were in accordance with those of previous randomized controlled trials testing the effectiveness of CBT for CFS. The total therapist time needed to treat a patient was significantly less in the stepped care condition. CONCLUSIONS:Stepped care is as effective as CBT and is more time efficient for the therapist. Copyright 2010 APA, all rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: In this randomized noninferiority study, the effectiveness and efficiency of stepped care for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) was compared to care as usual. Stepped care was formed by guided self-instruction, followed by cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) if the patient desired it. Care as usual encompassed CBT after a waiting period. METHOD: A total of 171 CFS patients were randomly allocated to stepped care or care as usual. Patients in both conditions were assessed 3 times: at baseline, after guided self-instruction or the waiting period, and after CBT. The primary outcome variables were fatigue severity (Checklist Individual Strength) and disabilities (Sickness Impact Profile and Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36). RESULTS: An intention to treat analysis showed that stepped care (N = 84) for CFS is noninferior to care as usual (N = 85). Both conditions were equivalent in reducing fatigue severity, reducing disabilities, and increasing physical functioning. The treatment results of both conditions were in accordance with those of previous randomized controlled trials testing the effectiveness of CBT for CFS. The total therapist time needed to treat a patient was significantly less in the stepped care condition. CONCLUSIONS: Stepped care is as effective as CBT and is more time efficient for the therapist. Copyright 2010 APA, all rights reserved.
Authors: Sanne L Nijhof; Gijs Bleijenberg; Cuno S P M Uiterwaal; Jan L L Kimpen; Elise M van de Putte Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2011-02-19 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Juliane Menting; Stephanie Nikolaus; Jan-Frederic Wiborg; Ellen Bazelmans; Martine M Goedendorp; Arianne C van Bon; Joop P van den Bergh; Marc J T M Mol; Cees J Tack; Hans Knoop Journal: Trials Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Margreet Worm-Smeitink; Anthonie Janse; Arno van Dam; Andrea Evers; Rosalie van der Vaart; Michel Wensing; Hans Knoop Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Stephan P Keijmel; Corine E Delsing; Tom Sprong; Gijs Bleijenberg; Jos W M van der Meer; Hans Knoop; Chantal P Bleeker-Rovers Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Marieke Houniet-de Gier; Heleen Beckerman; Kimberley van Vliet; Hans Knoop; Vincent de Groot Journal: Trials Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 2.279