Literature DB >> 20873883

The graying of academia: will it reduce scientific productivity?

Wolfgang Stroebe1.   

Abstract

The belief that science is a young person's game and that only young scientists can be productive and publish high-quality research is still widely shared by university administrators and members of the scientific community. Since the average age of university faculties is increasing not only in the United States but also in Europe, the question arises as to whether this belief is correct. If it were valid, the abolition of compulsory retirement in the United States and some parts of Canada would lower the productivity of these university systems. To address this question, this article reviews research on the association of age and scientific productivity conducted during the last four decades in North America and Europe. Whereas early research typically showed a decline in productivity after the ages of 40 to 45 years, this decline has been absent in more recent studies. Explanations for this change are discussed. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20873883     DOI: 10.1037/a0021086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  6 in total

1.  Beyond Ageist Attitudes: Researchers Call for NIH Action to Limit Funding for Older Academics.

Authors:  Eva Kahana; Michael R Slone; Boaz Kahana; Kaitlyn Barnes Langendoerfer; Courtney Reynolds
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2018-03-19

2.  The Impact of Policies Influencing the Demography of Age-Structured Populations: Lessons from Academies of Sciences.

Authors:  Fernando Riosmena; Maria Winkler-Dworak; Alexia Prskawetz; Gustav Feichtinger
Journal:  Genus       Date:  2012-05

3.  The aging of biomedical research in the United States.

Authors:  Kirstin R W Matthews; Kara M Calhoun; Nathan Lo; Vivian Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Performance curves of medical researchers during their career: analysis of scientific production from a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Antoine Duclos; Eléonore Herquelot; Stéphanie Polazzi; Muriel Malbezin; Olivier Claris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models.

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Jessica Herkes; Kate Churruca; Janet C Long; Chiara Pomare; Claire Boyling; Mia Bierbaum; Robyn Clay-Williams; Frances Rapport; Patti Shih; Anne Hogden; Louise A Ellis; Kristiana Ludlow; Elizabeth Austin; Rebecca Seah; Elise McPherson; Peter D Hibbert; Johanna Westbrook
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Downstream funding success of early career researchers for resubmitted versus new applications: A matched cohort.

Authors:  Jamie Mihoko Doyle; Michael T Baiocchi; Michaela Kiernan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.