Literature DB >> 20872643

Dredging processes and remedy effectiveness: Relationship to the 4 Rs of environmental dredging.

Todd S Bridges1, Karl E Gustavson, Paul Schroeder, Stephen J Ells, Donald Hayes, Steven C Nadeau, Michael R Palermo, Clay Patmont.   

Abstract

Timely and effective remediation of contaminated sediments is essential for protecting human health and the environment and restoring beneficial uses to waterways. A number of site operational conditions influence the effect of environmental dredging of contaminated sediment on aquatic systems. Site experience shows that resuspension of contaminated sediment and release of contaminants occur during dredging and that contaminated sediment residuals will remain after operations. It is also understood that these processes affect the magnitude, distribution, and bioavailability of the contaminants, and hence the exposure and risk to receptors of concern. However, even after decades of sediment remediation project experience, substantial uncertainties still exist in our understanding of the cause-effect relationships relating dredging processes to risk. During the past few years, contaminated sediment site managers, researchers, and practitioners have recognized the need to better define and understand dredging-related processes. In this article, we present information and research needs on these processes as synthesized from recent symposia, reports, and remediation efforts. Although predictions about the effect of environmental dredging continue to improve, a clear need remains to better understand the effect that sediment remediation processes have on contaminant exposures and receptors of concern. Collecting, learning from, and incorporating new information into practice is the only avenue to improving the effectiveness of remedial operations.
© 2010 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20872643     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  8 in total

1.  Bioaccumulation of metals in three freshwater mussel species exposed in situ during and after dredging at a coal ash spill site (Tennessee Valley Authority Kingston Fossil Plant).

Authors:  Ryan R Otter; David McKinney; Bobby Brown; Susan Lainer; William Monroe; Don Hubbs; Bob Read
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Escalating chronic kidney diseases of multi-factorial origin in Sri Lanka: causes, solutions, and recommendations.

Authors:  Sunil J Wimalawansa
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Assessment of the physical impact of a short-term dredging operation on a semi-enclosed environment: South Euboean Gulf, Greece.

Authors:  Theodore D Kanellopoulos; Ioannis P Panagiotopoulos; Aristomenis P Karageorgis; Aikaterini Kikaki; Ioannis Morfis; Georgios-Angelos Hatiris; Dimitris Vandarakis; Grigoris Rousakis; Vasilios Kapsimalis
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  TCDD administered on activated carbon eliminates bioavailability and subsequent shifts to a key murine gut commensal.

Authors:  Robert D Stedtfeld; J Brett Sallach; Robert B Crawford; Tiffany M Stedtfeld; Maggie R Williams; Hassan Waseem; Cliff T Johnston; Hui Li; Brian J Teppen; Norbert E Kaminski; Stephen A Boyd; James M Tiedje; Syed A Hashsham
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Bioaccumulation in Functionally Different Species: Ongoing Input of PCBs with Sediment Deposition to Activated Carbon Remediated Bed Sediments.

Authors:  Philip T Gidley; Alan J Kennedy; Guilherme R Lotufo; Allyson H Wooley; Nicolas L Melby; Upal Ghosh; Robert M Burgess; Philipp Mayer; Loretta A Fernandez; Stine N Schmidt; Alice P Wang; Todd S Bridges; Carlos E Ruiz
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 4.218

Review 6.  In situ sediment treatment using activated carbon: a demonstrated sediment cleanup technology.

Authors:  Clayton R Patmont; Upal Ghosh; Paul LaRosa; Charles A Menzie; Richard G Luthy; Marc S Greenberg; Gerard Cornelissen; Espen Eek; John Collins; John Hull; Tore Hjartland; Edward Glaza; John Bleiler; James Quadrini
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.992

Review 7.  Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: risk assessment and management.

Authors:  Marc S Greenberg; Peter M Chapman; Ian J Allan; Kim A Anderson; Sabine E Apitz; Chris Beegan; Todd S Bridges; Steve S Brown; John G Cargill; Megan C McCulloch; Charles A Menzie; James P Shine; Thomas F Parkerton
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Human Health Benefits from Fish Consumption vs. Risks from Inhalation Exposures Associated with Contaminated Sediment Remediation: Dredging of the Hudson River.

Authors:  Jacob Kvasnicka; Katerina S Stylianou; Vy K Nguyen; Lei Huang; Weihsueh A Chiu; G Allen Burton; Jeremy Semrau; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.