| Literature DB >> 20871812 |
Jan Willmann1, Herbert Thiele, Dieter Leibfritz.
Abstract
In respect of the manifold involvement of lipids in biochemical processes, the analysis of intact and underivatized lipids of body fluids as well as cell and tissue extracts is still a challenging task, if detailed molecular information is required. Therefore, the advantage of combined use of high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), mass spectrometry (MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy will be shown analyzing three different types of extracts of the ubiquitous membrane component phosphatidylcholine. At first, different reversed phase modifications were tested on phosphatidylcholines (PC) with the same effective carbon number (ECN) for their applicability in lipid analysis. The results were taken to improve the separation of three natural PC extract types and a new reversed phase (RP)-HPLC method was developed. The individual species were characterized by one- and two-dimensional NMR and positive or negative ion mode quadrupole time of flight (q-TOF)-MS as well as MS/MS techniques. Furthermore, ion suppression effects during electrospray ionisation (ESI), difficulties, limits, and advantages of the individual analytical techniques are addressed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20871812 PMCID: PMC2943112 DOI: 10.1155/2011/385786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol ISSN: 1110-7243
Retention times of different PC-components with the same ECN on different reversed phase columns.
| Lipid | Column type | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nucleosil 100-5 C6H5 | Nucleosil 100-5 C18 | Nucleodur C18 Gravity | Nucleodur Sphinx RP | Nucleodur C18 Isis | |
| DPPC | 1.46 (5.76)* | 56.82 | 78.00 | 14.31 | 49.19 |
| OPPC | 1.52 (6.49)* | 59.27 | 86.00 | 16.26 | 51.81 |
| POPC | 1.52 (6.48)* | 57.36 | 86.00 | 16.26 | 52.19 |
| DOPC | 1.64 (7.30)* | 57.18 | 98.67 | 19.11 | 56.40 |
| SLPC | 1.64 (7.58)* | 69.95 | 107.00 | 19.66 | 60.81 |
*mobile phase methanol/water (80 : 20).
Identified PC compounds within extracts of bovine brain, egg yolk, and soy bean.
| Fatty acid position | ECN | Bovine brain | Egg yolk | Soy bean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sn-1 position | sn-2 position | ||||
| Myristic acid(14 : 0) | Palmitic acid (16 : 0) | 30 | + | − | + |
| Palmitic acid (16 : 0) | Palmitoleic acid (16 : 1) | 30 | + | + | + |
| Palmitic acid (16 : 0) | Linoleic acid (18 : 2) | 30 | + | + | + |
| Palmitic acid (16 : 0) | Linolenic acid (18 : 3) | 28 | − | + | − |
| Palmitic acid (16 : 0) | Arachidonic acid (20 : 4) | 28 | + | + | + |
| Palmitic acid (16 : 0) | Palmitic acid (16 : 0) | 32 | + | + | + |
| Palmitic acid (16 : 0) | Oleic acid (18 : 1) | 32 | + | + | + |
| Stearic acid (18 : 0) | Linoleic acid (18 : 2) | 32 | + | + | + |
| Stearic acid (18 : 0) | Arachidonic acid (20 : 4) | 30 | + | − | + |
| C18 : 0 Plasmalogen | Oleic acid (18 : 1) | 34 | + | − | − |
| Palmitic acid (16 : 0) | Stearic acid (18 : 0) | 34 | + | − | − |
| Stearic acid (18 : 0) | Oleic acid (18 : 1) | 34 | + | + | + |
| Stearic acid (18 : 0) | Eicosenoic acid (20 : 1) | 36 | + | − | − |
Electrospray ionization efficiency of different fatty acid compared to undecanoic acid (pK = 4,69 for all acids).
| Fatty acid | Number of carbons | Empirical formula | Ionisation efficiency* (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| caprylic acid | 8 | C8H16O2 | 52 |
| capric acid | 10 | C10H20O2 | 64 |
| undecanoic acid | 11 | C11H22O2 | 100 |
| lauric acid | 12 | C12H24O2 | 131 |
| myristic acid | 14 | C14H28O2 | 194 |
| palmitic acid | 16 | C16H32O2 | 285 |
| stearic acid | 18 | C18H36O2 | 609 |
| eicosanoic acid | 20 | C20H40O2 | 2300 |
*compared to undecanoic acid.
Figure 1Variation of the fragmentation energy of negative ion mode ESI-MS2 of POPC (744.4).
Assignment of the individual observed fragments of POPC.
Figure 2Overlaid 13C-NMR spectral sections of olefinic carbons of PCs with MOFAs (top OPPC, middle POPC, and bottom DOPC).