Literature DB >> 20871718

Individualized strategy for dosing luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists for androgen-independent prostate cancer: identification of outcomes and costs.

Jennifer A Wagmiller1, Jennifer J Griggs, Andrew W Dick, Deepak M Sahasrabudhe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Continuing androgen suppression is the current standard in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). An individualized strategy, wherein luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LH-RHas) are redosed when serum testosterone approaches a non-castrate level, may decrease costs without worsening outcomes. To understand possible outcomes, we performed a cost-utility analysis comparing individualized and fixed LH-RHa dosing strategies in men with AIPC.
METHODS: The model used a societal perspective, a 5-year time horizon, and 3% annual cost discounting. The model accounted for direct costs of androgen suppression. Utilities were varied in accordance with published preference data.
RESULTS: Under base-case assumptions, individualized LH-RHa dosing yielded 1.089 expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), compared with 1.094 expected QALYs for fixed LH-RHa dosing. In cost analysis, lifetime per-patient costs for androgen suppression were estimated to be $5,694 for individualized LH-RHa dosing and $9,157 for fixed LH-RHa dosing. Applied to the total population, a strategy of individualized LH-RHa dosing would cost $170 million for androgen suppression, compared with $274 million for fixed LH-RHa dosing. Under these assumptions, adopting the individualized strategy resulted in $692,600 gained from a societal perspective for each QALY lost (the decremental cost utility).
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that an individualized LH-RHa dosing strategy would be associated with moderate savings on an individual basis but substantial savings on a population basis, and would not adversely affect quality of life or life expectancy. Further research is needed to establish the effects of this strategy on symptoms and survival, as well as patient satisfaction and true costs.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 20871718      PMCID: PMC2794621          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2006.2.2.57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  36 in total

1.  New and dis-improved: on the evaluation and use of less effective, less expensive medical interventions.

Authors:  David M Kent; A Mark Fendrick; Kenneth M Langa
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Treatment of an orchiectomized patient with hormone-refractory prostate cancer with LH-RH agonists.

Authors:  C Damyanov; B Tzingilev; V Tabakov
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Failure to achieve castrate levels of testosterone during luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist therapy: the case for monitoring serum testosterone and a treatment decision algorithm.

Authors:  M G Oefelein; R Cornum
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Evaluation of an implant that delivers leuprolide for 1 year for the palliative treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  J E Fowler; M Flanagan; D M Gleason; I W Klimberg; J E Gottesman; R Sharifi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Sudden death due to disease flare with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist therapy for carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  I M Thompson; E J Zeidman; F R Rodriguez
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Eligard: leuprolide acetate in a novel sustained-release delivery system.

Authors:  Oliver Sartor
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Importance of continued testicular suppression in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  C D Taylor; P Elson; D L Trump
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Survival of patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Michael G Oefelein; Piyush K Agarwal; Martin I Resnick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Goserelin versus orchiectomy in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer: final results of a randomized trial. Zoladex Prostate Study Group.

Authors:  N J Vogelzang; G W Chodak; M S Soloway; N L Block; P F Schellhammer; J A Smith; R J Caplan; G T Kennealey
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  3 in total

1.  Even more cost savings?

Authors:  James L Gulley; William D Figg; William Dahut
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Cost savings and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist.

Authors:  Steven Tucker
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Kinetics of serum androgen normalization and factors associated with testosterone reserve after limited androgen deprivation therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  James L Gulley; Jeanny B Aragon-Ching; Seth M Steinberg; Maha H Hussain; Oliver Sartor; Celestia S Higano; Daniel P Petrylak; Gurkamal S Chatta; Philip M Arlen; William D Figg; William L Dahut
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.