BACKGROUND: The optimal management of subtotally resected atypical meningiomas is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective review of patients with residual or recurrent atypical meningiomas treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: Twenty-five patients were treated, either immediately after surgery (n = 15) or at the time of radiographic progression or treatment failure (n = 10). SRS was delivered to with a median marginal dose of 22 Gy (range, 16-30) in 1 to 4 fractions (median, 1), targeting a median tumor volume of 5.3 cm³ (range, 0.3-26.0). RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 28 months (range, 3-67), the 12-, 24-, and 36-month actuarial local and regional control rates for all patients were 94%, 94%, 74%, and 90%, 90%, 62%, respectively. There were 2 cases of radiation toxicity. On univariate analysis, the number of recurrences before SRS (P = .046), late SRS (ie, waiting until tumor progression to initiate treatment) (P = .03), and age at treatment ≥ 60 years (P = .01) were significant predictors of recurrence. Of the 20 radiation-naïve patients, 2 patients failed with the targeted lesion and 3 elsewhere in the resection bed, resulting in 12-, 24- and 36-month actuarial local and regional control rates of 100%, 100%, 73% and 93%, 93%, 75%, respectively. The overall locoregional control rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 93%, 93%, and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Irradiation of the entire postoperative tumor bed may not be necessary for the majority of patients with subtotally resected atypical meningiomas. Patients in this series achieved outcomes comparable to that of historical control rates for larger volume, conventionally fractionated radiotherapy.
BACKGROUND: The optimal management of subtotally resected atypical meningiomas is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective review of patients with residual or recurrent atypical meningiomas treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: Twenty-five patients were treated, either immediately after surgery (n = 15) or at the time of radiographic progression or treatment failure (n = 10). SRS was delivered to with a median marginal dose of 22 Gy (range, 16-30) in 1 to 4 fractions (median, 1), targeting a median tumor volume of 5.3 cm³ (range, 0.3-26.0). RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 28 months (range, 3-67), the 12-, 24-, and 36-month actuarial local and regional control rates for all patients were 94%, 94%, 74%, and 90%, 90%, 62%, respectively. There were 2 cases of radiation toxicity. On univariate analysis, the number of recurrences before SRS (P = .046), late SRS (ie, waiting until tumor progression to initiate treatment) (P = .03), and age at treatment ≥ 60 years (P = .01) were significant predictors of recurrence. Of the 20 radiation-naïve patients, 2 patients failed with the targeted lesion and 3 elsewhere in the resection bed, resulting in 12-, 24- and 36-month actuarial local and regional control rates of 100%, 100%, 73% and 93%, 93%, 75%, respectively. The overall locoregional control rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 93%, 93%, and 54%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Irradiation of the entire postoperative tumor bed may not be necessary for the majority of patients with subtotally resected atypical meningiomas. Patients in this series achieved outcomes comparable to that of historical control rates for larger volume, conventionally fractionated radiotherapy.
Authors: Leland Rogers; Igor Barani; Marc Chamberlain; Thomas J Kaley; Michael McDermott; Jeffrey Raizer; David Schiff; Damien C Weber; Patrick Y Wen; Michael A Vogelbaum Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Arbaz A Momin; Jianning Shao; Pranay Soni; João Paulo Almeida; John H Suh; Erin S Murphy; Samuel T Chao; Lilyana Angelov; Alireza M Mohammadi; Gene H Barnett; Pablo F Recinos; Varun R Kshettry Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Muhammad O Chohan; Christopher T Ryan; Ranjodh Singh; Ryan M Lanning; Anne S Reiner; Marc K Rosenblum; Viviane Tabar; Philip H Gutin Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Hwa Kyung Byun; Won Ick Chang; Joo Ho Lee; Chul-Kee Park; In Ah Kim; Chae-Yong Kim; Jaeho Cho; Eui Hyun Kim; Jong Hee Chang; Seok-Gu Kang; Ju Hyung Moon; Sang Hyung Lee; Jason Joon Bock Lee; Il Han Kim; Chang-Ok Suh; Chan Woo Wee; Hong In Yoon Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Tamer Refaat; Michelle Gentile; Sean Sachdev; Prarthana Dalal; Anish Butala; Stanley Gutiontov; Irene Helenowksi; Plato Lee; Vythialinga Sathiaseelan; Orin Bloch; James Chandler; John A Kalapurakal Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2017-02-01
Authors: Leland Rogers; Peixin Zhang; Michael A Vogelbaum; Arie Perry; Lynn S Ashby; Jignesh M Modi; Anthony M Alleman; James Galvin; David Brachman; Joseph M Jenrette; John De Groot; Joseph A Bovi; Maria Werner-Wasik; Jonathan P S Knisely; Minesh P Mehta Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Hae Jin Park; Hyun-Cheol Kang; Il Han Kim; Sung-Hye Park; Dong Gyu Kim; Chul-Kee Park; Sun Ha Paek; Hee-Won Jung Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Brandon S Imber; Brian Neal; Dana L Casey; Heba Darwish; Andrew L Lin; Oren Cahlon; Brian Chon; Henry Tsai; Eugen Hug; Yoshiya Yamada; T Jonathan Yang Journal: Int J Part Ther Date: 2019-05-01