Literature DB >> 20871248

Does 2.5 cm of symphyseal widening differentiate anteroposterior compression I from anteroposterior compression II pelvic ring injuries?

Christopher J Doro1, Daren P Forward, Hyunchul Kim, Jason W Nascone, Marcus F Sciadini, Adam H Hsieh, Greg Osgood, Robert V O'Toole.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It has been proposed that 2.5 cm of diastasis of the symphysis pubis corresponds with injury to the anterior sacroiliac ligament and differentiates Young-Burgess anteroposterior compression Type I and II pelvic ring injuries. We hypothesized that if a pelvis has greater than 2.5 cm of symphysis pubis diastasis, the anterior sacroiliac ligaments are disrupted and the pelvic floor has failed.
METHODS: Pure torsional moment was applied to cadaveric human pelves with the hemipelvis either unconstrained (n = 10) or constrained to move only in the plane of rotation (n = 10). We recorded displacement of the symphysis pubis and sacroiliac joint and the applied torque that corresponded with failure of the anterior sacroiliac ligaments.
RESULTS: Average symphysis pubis diastasis at the point of anterior sacroiliac ligament failure was 2.2 cm (n = 20; range, 1-4.5 cm); however, 80% of the values were outside the range of 2 to 3 cm. Symphysis pubis diastasis in male specimens averaged 2.5 cm and in female specimens, 1.8 cm (P = 0.06). The sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments that make up the pelvic floor were not injured in unconstrained testing (zero of 10 specimens) but were at least attenuated in constrained testing (10 of 10 specimens), either simultaneously or after anterior sacroiliac ligament failure.
CONCLUSIONS: We were not able to confirm 2.5 cm of symphysis pubis diastasis as a valid differentiation point between anteroposterior compression I and II injuries because significant morphologic variation seems to exist. Our data support that anterior sacroiliac ligament disruption is likely for displacement greater than 4.5 cm and unlikely for values less than 1.8 cm. Our study suggests that sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments might not rupture at the same time as the anterior sacroiliac ligament.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20871248     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181cff42c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  7 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of instability in type B pelvic ring fractures.

Authors:  Ishvinder Singh Grewal; Hasan R Mir
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-10

Review 2.  [Research progress on minimally invasive treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture].

Authors:  Jianchao Wu; Zhengwei Shi; Jianwei Zhou; Yixin Pan; Shaoping Li; Yuliang Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-04-15

3.  An Atraumatic Symphysiolysis with a Unilateral Injured Sacroiliac Joint in a Patient with Cushing's Disease: A Loss of Pelvic Stability Related to Ligamentous Insufficiency?

Authors:  Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Faramarz Dehghani; Christoph Josten; Jörg Böhme
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2016-01-20

4.  Symphyseal fixation in open book injuries cannot fully compensate anterior SI joint injury-A biomechanical study in a two-leg alternating load model.

Authors:  Fabian M Stuby; Mark Lenz; Stefan Doebele; Yash Agarwal; Hristo Skulev; Björn G Ochs; Jörn Zwingmann; Boyko Gueorguiev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A biomechanics study on ligamentous injury in anterior-posterior compression type II pelvic injury.

Authors:  Jianzhong Kong; Yupeng Chu; Chengwei Zhou; Shuaibo Sun; Guodong Bao; Yu Xu; Xiaoshan Guo; Xiaolong Shui
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments influence in pelvis kinematics.

Authors:  Petr Henyš; Maziar Ramezani; Daniel Schewitz; Andreas Höch; Dustin Möbius; Benjamin Ondruschka; Niels Hammer
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.921

7.  Trans-obturator cable fixation of open book pelvic injuries.

Authors:  Martin C Jordan; Veronika Jäckle; Sebastian Scheidt; Fabian Gilbert; Stefanie Hölscher-Doht; Süleyman Ergün; Rainer H Meffert; Timo M Heintel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.