Literature DB >> 20870499

Reinforcement of motor evoked potentials by remote muscle contraction.

H Kawakita1, O Kameyama, R Ogawa, K C Hayes, D L Wolfe, R D Allatt.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of remote muscle contraction on the amplitude and latency of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from tibialis anterior and lateral gastrocnemius after transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. In particular, consideration was given to the effects of unilateral handgrip of different strengths, jaw clench, and combined bilateral handgrip (Jendrassik maneuver) and jaw clench. Eight healthy adult volunteer subjects (six women, two men) participated in the main study. The clinical usefulness of this form of facilitation was subsequently demonstrated in three patients with myelopathy. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex was delivered from a Cadwell MES-10 (100% intensity) with a 9.5-cm circular coil positioned with the rim over the vertex. Stimuli were delivered ∼ 1 s after initiation of reinforcement. In the main study of normal subjects, surface recordings of the evoked compound muscle action potentials were made bilaterally from anterior tibialis and lateral gastrocnemius. In the individual studies of patients, MEPs were also recorded from abductor pollicis brevis and other muscles innervated from roots below the level of lesion. The principal results showed that unilateral handgrip (50 and 100% maximum voluntary contraction, MVC) of either hand enhanced the amplitude of MEPs bilaterally in both tibialis anterior and lateral gastrocnemius in all normal subiects (p < 0.05). The mean increase in amplitude associated with 100% MVC unilateral handgrip was >300% of the control value when the subject was relaxed (p < 0.01). The bilateral Jendrassik maneuver and jaw clench were also effective in increasing (p < 0.05) MEP amplitude in both muscle groups. These two procedures did not yield the same degree of reinforcement as 100% unilateral handgrip. Remote muscle contractions induced a reduction in MEP latency of 1-2 ms (p < 0.05). The clinical importance of these observations was demonstrated by the fact that remote muscle reinforcement enabled identification of low-amplitude MEPs that might otherwise have been missed in the three patients with spinal cord trauma.
Copyright © 1991. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  1991        PMID: 20870499     DOI: 10.1016/1050-6411(91)90003-N

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  8 in total

1.  Disinhibition of upper limb motor area by voluntary contraction of the lower limb muscle.

Authors:  Toshiki Tazoe; Takashi Endoh; Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Masanori Sakamoto; Tomoyoshi Komiyama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Interaction between simultaneous contraction and relaxation in different limbs.

Authors:  Kouki Kato; Tetsuro Muraoka; Takatoshi Higuchi; Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Residual descending motor pathways influence spasticity after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Henrik Lundell; Steven Kirshblum; Monica A Perez
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Serotonin affects movement gain control in the spinal cord.

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Joshua I Glaser; Linna Deng; Christopher K Thompson; Ian H Stevenson; Qining Wang; Thomas George Hornby; Charles J Heckman; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Distinct patterns of spasticity and corticospinal connectivity following complete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sina Sangari; Steven Kirshblum; James D Guest; Martin Oudega; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.228

6.  Preparation and execution of teeth clenching and foot muscle contraction influence on corticospinal hand-muscle excitability.

Authors:  Naeem Komeilipoor; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Kaisa Tiippana; Martti Vainio; Mikko Tiainen; Lari Vainio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Corticospinal excitability for hand muscles during motor imagery of foot changes with imagined force level.

Authors:  Kouki Kato; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary commands on the spinal reflex excitability of remote limb muscles.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kato; Atsushi Sasaki; Hikaru Yokoyama; Matija Milosevic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.