Literature DB >> 20870430

Marital status independently predicts testis cancer survival--an analysis of the SEER database.

Michael R Abern1, Annie M Dude, Christopher L Coogan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Previous reports have shown that married men with malignancies have improved 10-year survival over unmarried men. We sought to investigate the effect of marital status on 10-year survival in a U.S. population-based cohort of men with testis cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 30,789 cases of testis cancer reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER 17) database between 1973 and 2005. All staging were converted to the 1997 AJCC TNM system. Patients less than 18 years of age at time of diagnosis were excluded. A subgroup analysis of patients with stages I or II non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) was performed. Univariate analysis using t-tests and χ(2) tests compared characteristics of patients separated by marital status. Multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazard model to generate Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with all-cause and cancer-specific mortality as the primary endpoints.
RESULTS: 20,245 cases met the inclusion criteria. Married men were more likely to be older (38.9 vs. 31.4 years), Caucasian (94.4% vs. 92.1%), stage I (73.1% vs. 61.4%), and have seminoma as the tumor histology (57.3% vs. 43.4%). On multivariate analysis, married status (HR 0.58, P < 0.001) and Caucasian race (HR 0.66, P < 0.001) independently predicted improved overall survival, while increased age (HR 1.05, P < 0.001), increased stage (HR 1.53-6.59, P < 0.001), and lymphoid (HR 4.05, P < 0.001), or NSGCT (HR 1.89, P < 0.001) histology independently predicted death. Similarly, on multivariate analysis, married status (HR 0.60, P < 0.001) and Caucasian race (HR 0.57, P < 0.001) independently predicted improved testis cancer-specific survival, while increased age (HR 1.03, P < 0.001), increased stage (HR 2.51-15.67, P < 0.001), and NSGCT (HR 2.54, P < 0.001) histology independently predicted testis cancer-specific death. A subgroup analysis of men with stages I or II NSGCT revealed similar predictors of all-cause survival as the overall cohort, with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as an additional independent predictor of overall survival (HR 0.59, P = 0.001), despite equal rates of the treatment between married and unmarried men (44.8% vs. 43.4%, P = 0.33).
CONCLUSIONS: Marital status is an independent predictor of improved overall and cancer-specific survival in men with testis cancer. In men with stages I or II NSGCT, RPLND is an additional predictor of improved overall survival. Marital status does not appear to influence whether men undergo RPLND.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20870430     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  11 in total

1.  Impact of marital status and race on outcomes of patients enrolled in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group prostate cancer trials.

Authors:  Kevin Lee Du; Kyounghwa Bae; Benjamin Movsas; Yan Yan; Charlene Bryan; Deborah Watkins Bruner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Testicular germ cell tumor: Short and long-term side effects of treatment among survivors.

Authors:  Thierry Gil; Spyridon Sideris; Fouad Aoun; Roland van Velthoven; Nicolas Sirtaine; Marianne Paesmans; Lieveke Ameye; Ahmad Awada; Daniel Devriendt; Alexandre Peltier
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-14

3.  Incorporating non-biological factors into the TNM staging system for better prognostication and decision-making in testicular cancer.

Authors:  Yongqiang Huang; Haoyue Sheng; Junyu Zhang; Qi Liu; Dingwei Ye; Guohai Shi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Marital Status and Survival in Patients with Carcinoid Tumors.

Authors:  Erin K Greenleaf; Amanda B Cooper; Christopher S Hollenbeak
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2016-04-07

5.  Associations between advanced cancer patients' survival and family caregiver presence and burden.

Authors:  J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Jay G Hull; Michelle Y Martin; Kathleen Doyle Lyons; Anna T Prescott; Tor Tosteson; Zhongze Li; Imatullah Akyar; Dheeraj Raju; Marie A Bakitas
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Does marital status impact postoperative survival in patients with less differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma? A population-based study.

Authors:  Bing Yan; Dou-Sheng Bai; Jian-Jun Qian; Chi Zhang; Sheng-Jie Jin; Guo-Qing Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma.

Authors:  Shuo Liu; Xiaoqiang Liu; Yingxiu Xiao; Shuying Chen; Weiduan Zhuang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Beyond biology: the impact of marital status on survival of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma.

Authors:  Zachary Klaassen; Lael Reinstatler; Martha K Terris; Willie Underwood; Kelvin A Moses
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

9.  Marital status and survival in patients with primary liver cancer.

Authors:  Xing-Kang He; Zheng-Hua Lin; Yun Qian; Daheng Xia; Piaopiao Jin; Lei-Min Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-05

10.  Marital Status and Survival in Osteosarcoma Patients: An Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.

Authors:  Shui Qiu; Lin Tao; Yue Zhu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.