Literature DB >> 20869827

Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR imaging: evaluation of biliary and renal excretion in normal and cirrhotic livers.

Tsutomu Tamada1, Katsuyoshi Ito, Teruki Sone, Akihiko Kanki, Tomohiro Sato, Hiroki Higashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the difference in the activity of biliary and renal excretion between normal and cirrhotic livers on contrast-enhanced MR imaging obtained with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA).
METHODS: A total of 78 patients with cirrhotic liver (n=44) and with normal liver (n=34) underwent multi-phase Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR imaging (arterial, portal, equilibrium, and three hepatobiliary phases (10, 15 and 20 min HP), respectively), and these contrast-enhanced images were qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated for the differences of the biliary and renal excretion between normal and cirrhotic livers.
RESULTS: The timing of biliary excretion of contrast agents in the cirrhotic liver was significantly slower than that in the normal liver (P<0.001). The degree of contrast enhancement in the common bile duct in the normal liver was significantly better than that in the cirrhotic liver (P=0.003). Contrast agents were demonstrated in the duodenum at 20 min HP in 8/44 (18%) cirrhotic liver while they were seen in 15/34 (44%) normal liver (P=0.013). The enhancement effects of renal medulla and portal vein at 20 min HP in the cirrhotic liver were significantly higher than those of normal liver (P=0.043 and P<0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Biliary excretion of Gd-EOB-DPTA was impaired in cirrhotic livers in comparison with normal livers while renal excretion of Gd-EOB-DPTA was increased.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20869827     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  10 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver in the era of gadoxetic acid.

Authors:  Francesco Agnello; Marco Dioguardi Burgio; Dario Picone; Federica Vernuccio; Giuseppe Cabibbo; Lydia Giannitrapani; Adele Taibbi; Antonino Agrusa; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Massimo Galia; Roberto Lagalla; Massimo Midiri; Giuseppe Brancatelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Assessment of hepatitis and fibrosis using Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI in dogs.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Tanaka; Hidetaka Nishida; Keiichiro Mie; Hiroki Yamazaki; Lee-Shuan Lin; Hideo Akiyoshi
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2020-08-03

3.  Transient severe motion during arterial phase in patients with Gadoxetic acid administration: Can a five hepatic arterial subphases technique mitigate the artifact?

Authors:  Yu-Dong Xiao; Cong Ma; Jun Liu; Hua-Bing Li; Shun-Ke Zhou; Zi-Shu Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Role of stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoko Sanuki; Atsuya Takeda; Etsuo Kunieda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Accumulation of Bile in the Gallbladder: Evaluation by means of Serial Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography with Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic Acid.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Katsuyoshi Ito; Kazuya Yasokawa; Atsushi Higaki; Akihiko Kanki; Yasufumi Noda; Akira Yamamoto
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Non-invasive detection of biliary leaks using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography: comparison with T2-weighted MR cholangiography.

Authors:  Mecit Kantarcı; Berhan Pirimoglu; Nevzat Karabulut; Ummugulsum Bayraktutan; Hayri Ogul; Gurkan Ozturk; Bulent Aydinli; Yesim Kizrak; Suat Eren; Sinan Yilmaz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  MRI-based estimation of liver function: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced T1 relaxometry of 3T vs. the MELD score.

Authors:  Michael Haimerl; Niklas Verloh; Claudia Fellner; Florian Zeman; Andreas Teufel; Stefan Fichtner-Feigl; Andreas G Schreyer; Christian Stroszczynski; Philipp Wiggermann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Evaluation of hypointense liver lesions during hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in normal and cirrhotic livers: is increasing flip angle reliable?

Authors:  Yu-dong Xiao; Cong Ma; Jun Liu; Hua-bing Li; Zi-shu Zhang; Shun-ke Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Visual assessment of biliary excretion of Gd-EOB-DTPA in patients with suspected diffuse liver disease - A biopsy-verified prospective study.

Authors:  Bengt Norén; Nils Dahlström; Mikael Fredrik Forsgren; Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard; Stergios Kechagias; Sven Almer; Staffan Wirell; Örjan Smedby; Peter Lundberg
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2015-01-09

10.  Detection and characterization of traumatic bile leaks using Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography.

Authors:  Yon-Cheong Wong; Li-Jen Wang; Cheng-Hsien Wu; Huan-Wu Chen; Chen-Ju Fu; Kuo-Ching Yuan; Being-Chuan Lin; Yu-Pao Hsu; Shih-Ching Kang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.