OBJECTIVE: This study examined the biological and clinical significance of NAC1 expression in ovarian cancer and assessed whether NAC1 has the potential to be a therapeutic target. METHODS: NAC1 expression and gene amplification were assessed in ovarian cancers by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and clinical data collected by a retrospective chart review. NAC1 gene knockdown using silencing RNA and a NAC1 gene transfection system were used to assess NAC1 function in ovarian cancer tissue samples. RESULTS: The frequency of positive NAC1 expression in serous adenocarcinomas (50.0%:22/44) was significantly higher than that in the other histological subtypes (33.3%: 10/30). NAC1 gene amplification was identified in seven (9.5%) of 74 ovarian carcinomas. Positive NAC1 expression significantly correlated with shorter disease-free and overall survival (P = 0.002, P = 0.0048). A multivariate analysis showed that positive NAC1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free and overall survival after standard platinum-taxane chemotherapy (P = 0.0027, P = 0.0302). Profound growth inhibition, increased apoptosis, decreased cell proliferation, and decreased cell migration and invasion were observed in silencing RNA-treated cancer cells with NAC1 overexpression compared with cancer cells without NAC1 expression. NAC1 overexpression stimulated proliferation, migration, and invasion in ovarian cancer cell lines KF28 and TOV-21G, which normally lacked NAC1 expression. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that NAC1 over-expression is critical to the growth and survival of ovarian cancers. Furthermore, they suggest that NAC1 silencing RNA-induced phenotypes depend on the expression status of the targeted cell line. Therefore, NAC1-targeted therapy may benefit ovarian cancer patients with NAC1 expression.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the biological and clinical significance of NAC1 expression in ovarian cancer and assessed whether NAC1 has the potential to be a therapeutic target. METHODS:NAC1 expression and gene amplification were assessed in ovarian cancers by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and clinical data collected by a retrospective chart review. NAC1 gene knockdown using silencing RNA and a NAC1 gene transfection system were used to assess NAC1 function in ovarian cancer tissue samples. RESULTS: The frequency of positive NAC1 expression in serous adenocarcinomas (50.0%:22/44) was significantly higher than that in the other histological subtypes (33.3%: 10/30). NAC1 gene amplification was identified in seven (9.5%) of 74 ovarian carcinomas. Positive NAC1 expression significantly correlated with shorter disease-free and overall survival (P = 0.002, P = 0.0048). A multivariate analysis showed that positive NAC1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free and overall survival after standard platinum-taxane chemotherapy (P = 0.0027, P = 0.0302). Profound growth inhibition, increased apoptosis, decreased cell proliferation, and decreased cell migration and invasion were observed in silencing RNA-treated cancer cells with NAC1 overexpression compared with cancer cells without NAC1 expression. NAC1 overexpression stimulated proliferation, migration, and invasion in ovarian cancer cell lines KF28 and TOV-21G, which normally lacked NAC1 expression. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that NAC1 over-expression is critical to the growth and survival of ovarian cancers. Furthermore, they suggest that NAC1 silencing RNA-induced phenotypes depend on the expression status of the targeted cell line. Therefore, NAC1-targeted therapy may benefit ovarian cancerpatients with NAC1 expression.
Authors: Yi Zhang; Yan Cheng; Xingcong Ren; Tsukasa Hori; Kathryn J Huber-Keener; Li Zhang; Kai Lee Yap; David Liu; Lisa Shantz; Zheng-Hong Qin; Suping Zhang; Jianrong Wang; Hong-Gang Wang; Ie-Ming Shih; Jin-Ming Yang Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Kai Lee Yap; Stephanie I Fraley; Michelle M Thiaville; Natini Jinawath; Kentaro Nakayama; Jianlong Wang; Tian-Li Wang; Denis Wirtz; Ie-Ming Shih Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Kelly Schoch; Linyan Meng; Szabolcs Szelinger; David R Bearden; Asbjorg Stray-Pedersen; Oyvind L Busk; Nicholas Stong; Eriskay Liston; Ronald D Cohn; Fernando Scaglia; Jill A Rosenfeld; Jennifer Tarpinian; Cara M Skraban; Matthew A Deardorff; Jeremy N Friedman; Zeynep Coban Akdemir; Nicole Walley; Mohamad A Mikati; Peter G Kranz; Joan Jasien; Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Marie McDonald; Stephanie Burns Wechsler; Michael Freemark; Sujay Kansagra; Sharon Freedman; Deeksha Bali; Francisca Millan; Sherri Bale; Stanley F Nelson; Hane Lee; Naghmeh Dorrani; David B Goldstein; Rui Xiao; Yaping Yang; Jennifer E Posey; Julian A Martinez-Agosto; James R Lupski; Michael F Wangler; Vandana Shashi Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 11.043
Authors: M T Rahman; K Nakayama; M Rahman; H Katagiri; A Katagiri; T Ishibashi; M Ishikawa; K Iida; N Nakayama; Y Otsuki; S Nakayama; K Miyazaki Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Pedram Argani; Doreen N Palsgrove; Robert A Anders; Steven C Smith; Carla Saoud; Regina Kwon; Lysandra Voltaggio; Naziheh Assarzadegan; Kiyoko Oshima; Lisa Rooper; Andres Matoso; Lei Zhang; Brandi L Cantarel; Jeffrey Gagan; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 6.298