OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique for sonographically guided acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injections and compare its accuracy to palpation-guided injections in a cadaveric model. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory investigation. SETTING: Procedural skills laboratory at a tertiary medical center. METHODS: A single experienced operator completed 10 sonographically guided and 10 palpation-guided ACJ injections in unembalmed cadavers. Injection order was randomized and all injections were completed with diluted colored latex. Co-investigators blinded to the injection technique dissected each specimen and graded colored latex location as accurate (in the ACJ), partially accurate (within and outside the ACJ), or inaccurate (no latex in the ACJ). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Direct assessment of injected dye within the ACJ via dissection. RESULTS: All 10 sonographically guided ACJ injections accurately placed latex into the ACJ (100% accuracy), whereas only 4 of 10 (40%) palpation-guided injections accurately placed latex within the ACJ (P = .0054). CONCLUSIONS: This cadaveric investigation suggests that sonographic guidance can be used to inject the ACJ with a high degree of accuracy, and should be considered superior to palpation guidance. Clinicians should consider using sonographic guidance to inject the ACJ when diagnostic specificity is paramount or when otherwise clinically indicated.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To describe a technique for sonographically guided acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injections and compare its accuracy to palpation-guided injections in a cadaveric model. DESIGN: Prospective laboratory investigation. SETTING: Procedural skills laboratory at a tertiary medical center. METHODS: A single experienced operator completed 10 sonographically guided and 10 palpation-guided ACJ injections in unembalmed cadavers. Injection order was randomized and all injections were completed with diluted colored latex. Co-investigators blinded to the injection technique dissected each specimen and graded colored latex location as accurate (in the ACJ), partially accurate (within and outside the ACJ), or inaccurate (no latex in the ACJ). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Direct assessment of injected dye within the ACJ via dissection. RESULTS: All 10 sonographically guided ACJ injections accurately placed latex into the ACJ (100% accuracy), whereas only 4 of 10 (40%) palpation-guided injections accurately placed latex within the ACJ (P = .0054). CONCLUSIONS: This cadaveric investigation suggests that sonographic guidance can be used to inject the ACJ with a high degree of accuracy, and should be considered superior to palpation guidance. Clinicians should consider using sonographic guidance to inject the ACJ when diagnostic specificity is paramount or when otherwise clinically indicated.
Authors: Michael K Krill; Samuel Rosas; KiHyun Kwon; Andrew Dakkak; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Frank McCormick Journal: Phys Sportsmed Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 2.241
Authors: Amy W McDevitt; Joshua A Cleland; Colin Strickland; Paul Mintken; Mary Becky Leibold; Maria Borg; Rebecca Altic; Suzanne Snodgrass Journal: J Phys Ther Sci Date: 2020-11-11