| Literature DB >> 20869044 |
Chiquita Palha De Sousa1, Christopher M Blum, Erica P Sgroe, Alexander M Crespo, Robert A Kurt.
Abstract
Although TLR are often studied on DC because of their ability to bridge innate and adaptive defenses, TLR are also expressed by epithelial cells. Because the majority of cancers are carcinomas, and thus of epithelial origin, we wanted to know whether a carcinoma and DC responded similarly to a TLR agonist. We found the mammary carcinoma 4T1 and CD11c(+) DC both secreted proinflammatory chemokines in response to the TLR4 agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS). However a clear dichotomy existed. DC, but not 4T1 secreted IL-1β, TNF-α, and upregulated CD80 and CD86 expression following LPS treatment. A potential reason for differential responsiveness was that DC expressed greater levels of TLR4, CD14, Myd88, and TRAM. Despite the low level of TLR signaling proteins, the carcinoma were able to elicit a range of responses contingent upon the source, dose, length, and frequency of TLR agonist treatment. Thus, carcinoma and DC are distinctly responsive to LPS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20869044 PMCID: PMC2966517 DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2010.08.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Immunol ISSN: 0008-8749 Impact factor: 4.868