Literature DB >> 20868758

Comparison of the NIDS® rapid assay with ELISA methods in immunogenicity testing of two biotherapeutics.

Jing Pan1, Thomas Small, Dujie Qin, Shawn Li, Li Wang, Dave Chen, Cindy Pauley, Thorsten Verch, Catherine Kaplanski, Ray Bakhtiar, Yli Remo Vallejo, Ray Yin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rapid lateral flow immunogenicity assays for the detection of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to two biotherapeutic antibodies, an anti-HER2 antibody and an anti-TNF-α antibody, were developed using ANP Technologies, Inc.'s proprietary Nano-Intelligent Detection System (NIDS®) and compared to their ELISA counterparts.
METHODS: Biotin and hapten-labeled drugs are incubated with the patient serum sample to allow ADA to form a bridge complex with each drug conjugate. The reaction mixture is then added to a test strip with an anti-hapten capture zone which captures the mixed bridge complex. The bridge-complexed biotinylated drug then reacts with streptavidin-labeled gold particles in situ. The signal developed at the capture zone, which is directly proportional to ADA in the sample, is then quantitatively measured with a handheld reader. The counterpart ELISAs were run using the same reagents. Dose-response, specificity/free drug depletion, and screening cut-point assays were performed using both methods.
RESULTS: The rapid assays' performance compare very closely to their ELISA counterparts'. Both types of assays identified the same positive samples in screening a limited population of 50 normal serum samples for the anti-HER2 antibody. In the case of anti-TNF-α, both assays identified the same positive samples out of 50 normal and 20 rheumatoid arthritis patient serum samples but differed in the assessment of two others. The rapid assay correctly identified as negative an ELISA false positive sample, and correctly tested as positive an ELISA false negative sample. Positive results were verified with a specificity/free drug depletion assay. DISCUSSION: The NIDS® rapid immunogenicity assay offers distinct advantages over current methods in simplicity, low cost, and short time to result. More importantly, the method requires no sample dilution and no washing steps which can perturb fragile complexes formed by low-affinity ADAs. Thus, the assay can potentially detect ADAs with various affinities.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20868758     DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods        ISSN: 1056-8719            Impact factor:   1.950


  2 in total

1.  Aggregation, immune complexes and immunogenicity.

Authors:  Roy Jefferis
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Ligand binding assays in the 21st Century laboratory: platforms.

Authors:  Franklin P Spriggs; Zhandong Don Zhong; Afshin Safavi; Darshana Jani; Narasaiah Dontha; Anita Kant; Jenny Ly; Lia Brilando; Karolina Österlund; Nathalie Rouleau; Saloumeh Kadkhodayan Fischer; Martin Boissonneault; Chad Ray
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.009

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.