Stephan Brecht 1 , Durisala Desaiah , Elisete S Marechal , Ambra M Santini , Jana Podhorna , Julien D Guelfi . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether hospitalized patients with severe depression and potential suicidal ideation/behavior have earlier and better response to duloxetine 120 mg daily than 60 mg daily. METHOD: Adults from 34 sites in 4 countries with severe major depressive disorder, defined by DSM-IV criteria, who were demonstrating Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores ≥ 30, 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-6) scores ≥ 12, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) ≥ 4 and hospitalized ≥ 2 weeks underwent double-blind treatment with either duloxetine 60 mg (n = 167) or 120 mg (n = 171) daily for 8 weeks. Patients treated with 60 mg/d who did not respond had their doses titrated up to 120 mg/d. Primary outcome was the difference in baseline to week 4 change in MADRS scores between the groups. Secondary outcomes were baseline to week 8 changes in MADRS and HDRS-6 scores, response and remission, CGI-S scores, CGI-Improvement scores, Patient Global Impressions-Improvement, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores, and Reasons For Living inventory results . Safety was also assessed. The study was conducted between February 9, 2007, and August 26, 2008 . RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean baseline to week 4 MADRS score change between the 60-mg (-20.1) and 120-mg (-19.9) groups (P = .88). At week 4, 96/166 (60 mg) and 106/170 (120 mg) patients responded and maintained responses at week 8 by further decreasing mean MADRS scores to 5.8 (60 mg) and 5.6 (120 mg). At week 8, 226/336 (67.3%) patients achieved remission, with no difference demonstrated between groups. Most secondary efficacy measures were significantly reduced from baseline to week 8 within each group and did not differ between groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events observed with > 10% frequency in both groups were headache and nausea . CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine 60-mg and 120-mg doses were equally effective and demonstrated no significant differences in treating severe depressive symptoms in hospitalized patients . The safety and tolerability profile of duloxetine in both dosages did not differ and was similar to those reported in previous duloxetine studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00422162. © Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
RCT Entities: Population
Interventions
Outcomes
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether hospitalized patients with severe depression and potential suicidal ideation/behavior have earlier and better response to duloxetine 120 mg daily than 60 mg daily. METHOD: Adults from 34 sites in 4 countries with severe major depressive disorder , defined by DSM-IV criteria, who were demonstrating Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores ≥ 30, 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-6) scores ≥ 12, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) ≥ 4 and hospitalized ≥ 2 weeks underwent double-blind treatment with either duloxetine 60 mg (n = 167) or 120 mg (n = 171) daily for 8 weeks. Patients treated with 60 mg/d who did not respond had their doses titrated up to 120 mg/d. Primary outcome was the difference in baseline to week 4 change in MADRS scores between the groups. Secondary outcomes were baseline to week 8 changes in MADRS and HDRS-6 scores, response and remission, CGI-S scores, CGI-Improvement scores, Patient Global Impressions-Improvement, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores, and Reasons For Living inventory results. Safety was also assessed. The study was conducted between February 9, 2007, and August 26, 2008. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean baseline to week 4 MADRS score change between the 60-mg (-20.1) and 120-mg (-19.9) groups (P = .88). At week 4, 96/166 (60 mg) and 106/170 (120 mg) patients responded and maintained responses at week 8 by further decreasing mean MADRS scores to 5.8 (60 mg) and 5.6 (120 mg). At week 8, 226/336 (67.3%) patients achieved remission, with no difference demonstrated between groups. Most secondary efficacy measures were significantly reduced from baseline to week 8 within each group and did not differ between groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events observed with > 10% frequency in both groups were headache and nausea . CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine 60-mg and 120-mg doses were equally effective and demonstrated no significant differences in treating severe depressive symptoms in hospitalized patients . The safety and tolerability profile of duloxetine in both dosages did not differ and was similar to those reported in previous duloxetine studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00422162. © Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Species
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2010
PMID: 20868642 DOI: 10.4088/JCP.09m05723blu
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Psychiatry ISSN: 0160-6689 Impact factor: 4.384