Literature DB >> 20868642

Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg and 120 mg daily in patients hospitalized for severe depression: a double-blind randomized trial.

Stephan Brecht1, Durisala Desaiah, Elisete S Marechal, Ambra M Santini, Jana Podhorna, Julien D Guelfi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether hospitalized patients with severe depression and potential suicidal ideation/behavior have earlier and better response to duloxetine 120 mg daily than 60 mg daily.
METHOD: Adults from 34 sites in 4 countries with severe major depressive disorder, defined by DSM-IV criteria, who were demonstrating Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores ≥ 30, 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-6) scores ≥ 12, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) ≥ 4 and hospitalized ≥ 2 weeks underwent double-blind treatment with either duloxetine 60 mg (n = 167) or 120 mg (n = 171) daily for 8 weeks. Patients treated with 60 mg/d who did not respond had their doses titrated up to 120 mg/d. Primary outcome was the difference in baseline to week 4 change in MADRS scores between the groups. Secondary outcomes were baseline to week 8 changes in MADRS and HDRS-6 scores, response and remission, CGI-S scores, CGI-Improvement scores, Patient Global Impressions-Improvement, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores, and Reasons For Living inventory results. Safety was also assessed. The study was conducted between February 9, 2007, and August 26, 2008.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in mean baseline to week 4 MADRS score change between the 60-mg (-20.1) and 120-mg (-19.9) groups (P = .88). At week 4, 96/166 (60 mg) and 106/170 (120 mg) patients responded and maintained responses at week 8 by further decreasing mean MADRS scores to 5.8 (60 mg) and 5.6 (120 mg). At week 8, 226/336 (67.3%) patients achieved remission, with no difference demonstrated between groups. Most secondary efficacy measures were significantly reduced from baseline to week 8 within each group and did not differ between groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events observed with > 10% frequency in both groups were headache and nausea.
CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine 60-mg and 120-mg doses were equally effective and demonstrated no significant differences in treating severe depressive symptoms in hospitalized patients. The safety and tolerability profile of duloxetine in both dosages did not differ and was similar to those reported in previous duloxetine studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00422162. © Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20868642     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.09m05723blu

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  5 in total

1.  Suicidal thoughts and reasons for living in hospitalized patients with severe depression: post-hoc analyses of a double-blind randomized trial of duloxetine.

Authors:  Koen Demyttenaere; Durisala Desaiah; Joel Raskin; Victoria Cairns; Stephan Brecht
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2014-05-01

2.  Suprathreshold duloxetine for treatment-resistant depression, anorexia nervosa binge-purging type, and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a case report.

Authors:  Debra L Safer; Katherine D Arnow
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-03

3.  Duloxetine in affective disorders: a naturalistic study on psychiatric and medical comorbidity, use in association and tolerability across different age groups.

Authors:  Bernardo Dell'osso; Giulia Camuri; Cristina Dobrea; Massimiliano Buoli; Marta Serati; A Carlo Altamura
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2012-11-02

4.  Pharmacological interventions for treatment-resistant depression in adults.

Authors:  Philippa Davies; Sharea Ijaz; Catherine J Williams; David Kessler; Glyn Lewis; Nicola Wiles
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-17

5.  A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Duloxetine.

Authors:  Daniela Rodrigues-Amorim; José Manuel Olivares; Carlos Spuch; Tania Rivera-Baltanás
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.157

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.