Literature DB >> 20868451

Long-term outcome of dental implants placed in revascularized fibula free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects due to extreme atrophy.

Matteo Chiapasco1, Eugenio Romeo, Alberto Coggiola, Roberto Brusati.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: the objectives of this study were to evaluate (a) the clinical outcome of revascularized fibula flaps used for the reconstruction of extremely atrophic jaws and (b) the survival rates of dental implants placed in the reconstructed areas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: between 1999 and 2004, 12 patients presenting with extreme atrophy of the edentulous jaws were reconstructed with fibula free flaps. Five to 12 months after the reconstructive procedure, 75 titanium dental implants were placed in the reconstructed areas, while prosthetic rehabilitation was started 4-6 months afterward. The mean follow-up of patients after the start of prosthetic loading was 77 months (range: 48-116).
RESULTS: an uneventful healing of the bone transplants occurred in all patients. One out of the 75 dental implants placed was not loaded due to prosthetic reasons. No dental implants failed to integrate before prosthetic loading, while three were removed during the follow-up period. Despite the high survival rate of dental implants (95.8%), a relevant number of them presented relevant peri-implant bone-level loss, ranging from 1 to 7 mm for maxillary dental implants and from 1 to 4.5 mm for mandibular dental implants.
CONCLUSION: although no failures of the bone transplants occurred and a high long-term survival rate of dental implants were observed, this study showed that fibula free flaps do not guarantee dimensional stability of peri-implant bone, despite the immediate blood supply delivered by the vascular pedicle. The peri-implant bone resorption was higher when compared with the one related to dental implants placed in native bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20868451     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01999.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  Masticatory rehabilitation following upper and lower jaw reconstruction using vascularised free fibula flap and enossal implants-19 years of experience with a comprehensive concept.

Authors:  Samer George Hakim; Harald Kimmerle; Thomas Trenkle; Peter Sieg; Hans-Christian Jacobsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  LeFort I Osteotomy.

Authors:  Edward P Buchanan; Charles H Hyman
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Quadruple zygomatic implants supported rehabilitation in failed maxillary bone reconstruction.

Authors:  Pier Francesco Nocini; Lorenzo Trevisiol; Antonio D'Agostino; Giovanni Zanette; Vittorio Favero; Pasquale Procacci
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-02-25

4.  Mandibular kinematics and maximum voluntary bite force following segmental resection of the mandible without or with reconstruction.

Authors:  Sabine S Linsen; Annina Oikonomou; Markus Martini; Marcus Teschke
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  What Is the Success of Implants Placed in Fibula Flap? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pooja Gangwani; Mohammed Almana; Basir Barmak; Antonia Kolokythas
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 6.  Long-term effects of vertical bone augmentation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Johan Anton Jochum Keestra; Obada Barry; Lianne de Jong; Gerhard Wahl
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Comparison of the Effect of Four Different Abutment Screw Torques on Screw Loosening in Single Implant-Supported Prosthesis after the Application of Mechanical Loading.

Authors:  Behnaz Ebadian; Amirhossein Fathi; Saba Khodadad
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-07-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.