Literature DB >> 20868346

Factors driving the choice of the best second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Paolo Maione1, Antonio Rossi, Maria Anna Bareschino, Paola Claudia Sacco, Clorinda Schettino, Marzia Falanga, Valentina Barbato, Rita Ambrosio, Cesare Gridelli.   

Abstract

Platinum-based chemotherapy, with or without the antiangiogenetic drug bevacizumab, is the standard first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) gefitinib has been recently approved as treatment of patients with EGFR mutated tumors (including first-line). Three agents are approved for treating non-selected patients who progress after one prior regimen: docetaxel, pemetrexed, and the EGFR-TKI erlotinib. Gefitinib can be used as second-line treatment in patients with EGFR mutated tumors. Although these agents have yelded similar outcomes in terms of antitumor activity and efficacy in unselected NSCLC patients, they have different toxicity profiles, and recently some strong factors that can help in the choice among them have been detected. In particular, the hystotype, the EGFR gene mutational status, the response to previous first-line chemotherapy and the correlation of the safety profile of the agents with Performance Status and comorbidities of the patients, are the most important factors that drive the choice of the second-line treatment. Obviously, the drugs administered in the first-line treatment strongly influence the choice of the second-line treatment because some of the currently available drugs can be used in both settings. Thus, more than in the past, first and second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC are linked, and the choice of second-line treatment is part of a strategy decided when beginning the first-line treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20868346     DOI: 10.2174/157488711793980192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials        ISSN: 1574-8871


  6 in total

Review 1.  The impact of second-line agents on patients' health-related quality of life in the treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arijit Ganguli; Phillip Wiegand; Xin Gao; John A Carter; Marc F Botteman; Saurabh Ray
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Nedaplatin/Gemcitabine Versus Carboplatin/Gemcitabine in Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jin-Ji Yang; Qing Zhou; Ri-Qiang Liao; Yi-Sheng Huang; Chong-Rui Xu; Zhen Wang; Bin-Chao Wang; Hua-Jun Chen; Yi-Long Wu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.087

3.  Incidence and risk of hepatic toxicities associated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bing Liu; Maoxi Yuan; Yi Sun; Ziming Cheng; Zaiyong Zhang; Shizheng Hou; Xiangdong Wang; Jingfeng Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-16

4.  Efficacy and safety of ceritinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Tian; Ping Zhang; Yuan Yuan; Xiao-Hui Deng; Rui Yue; Xiao-Zhu Ge
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Cost comparison of second-line treatment options for late stage non-small-cell lung cancer: cost analysis for Italy.

Authors:  Bjoern Schwander; Simona Ravera; Giovanni Giuliani; Mark Nuijten; Stefan Walzer
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2012-09-03

Review 6.  Meta-analysis of overall incidence and risk of ALK inhibitors-induced liver toxicities in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jingjie Li; Zhi Yuan; Qun Wang; Weijie Fan; Guoping Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.