Literature DB >> 20868211

Atypical pituitary adenomas: incidence, clinical characteristics, and implications.

Gabriel Zada1, Whitney W Woodmansee, Shakti Ramkissoon, Jordan Amadio, Vania Nose, Edward R Laws.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The 2004 WHO classification of pituitary adenomas now includes an "atypical" variant, defined as follows: MIB-1 proliferative index greater than 3%, excessive p53 immunoreactivity, and increased mitotic activity. The authors review the incidence of this atypical histopathological subtype and its correlation with tumor subtype, invasion, and surgical features.
METHODS: The records of 121 consecutive patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas during an 18-month period were retrospectively reviewed for evidence of atypical adenomas.
RESULTS: Eighteen adenomas (15%) met the criteria for atypical lesions; 17 (94%) of the 18 were macroadenomas. On imaging, 15 (83%) demonstrated imaging evidence of surrounding invasion, compared with 45% of typical adenomas (p = 0.004). Atypical tumors occurred in 12 female (67%) and 6 male (33%) patients. Patient age ranged from 16 to 70 years (mean 48 years). Nine patients (50%) had hormonally active tumors, and 9 had nonfunctional lesions. Four (22%) of the 18 patients presented to us with recurrent tumors. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated the following tumor subtypes: GH-secreting adenoma with plurihormonal staining (5 patients [28%]); null-cell adenoma (5 patients [28%]); silent ACTH tumor (3 patients [17%]), ACTH-staining tumor with Cushing's disease (2 patients [11%]), prolactinoma (2 patients [11%]), and silent FSH-staining tumor (1 patient [6%]). The MIB-1 labeling index ranged from 3% to 20% (mean 7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Atypical tumors were identified in 15% of resected pituitary adenomas, and they tended to be aggressive, invasive macroadenomas. More longitudinal follow-up is required to determine whether surgical outcomes, potential for recurrence, or metastasis of atypical adenomas vary significantly from their typical counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20868211     DOI: 10.3171/2010.8.JNS10290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  62 in total

Review 1.  Medical treatment of prolactinomas.

Authors:  Annamaria Colao; Silvia Savastano
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Mid-term prognosis of non-functioning pituitary adenomas with high proliferative potential: really an aggressive variant?

Authors:  Yoshikazu Ogawa; Hidefumi Jokura; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Advances and controversies in the classification and grading of pituitary tumors.

Authors:  E R Laws; D L Penn; C S Repetti
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Role of a p53 polymorphism in the development of nonfunctional pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Garima Yagnik; Arman Jahangiri; Rebecca Chen; Jeffrey R Wagner; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 5.  Pediatric Pituitary Adenoma: Case Series, Review of the Literature, and a Skull Base Treatment Paradigm.

Authors:  Avital Perry; Christopher Salvatore Graffeo; Christopher Marcellino; Bruce E Pollock; Nicholas M Wetjen; Fredric B Meyer
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-01-24

6.  Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for aggressive atypical pituitary adenoma/carcinoma: variable clinical response in preliminary evaluation.

Authors:  Jillian Maclean; Matthew Aldridge; Jamshed Bomanji; Susan Short; Naomi Fersht
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 7.  Management of aggressive pituitary adenomas and pituitary carcinomas.

Authors:  Anthony Heaney
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Prolactinoma ErbB receptor expression and targeted therapy for aggressive tumors.

Authors:  Odelia Cooper; Adam Mamelak; Serguei Bannykh; John Carmichael; Vivien Bonert; Stephen Lim; Galen Cook-Wiens; Anat Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Pituitary macroadenoma: Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient magnetic resonance imaging in grading tumor aggressiveness.

Authors:  Mariko Doai; Hisao Tonami; Munetaka Matoba; Osamu Tachibana; Hideaki Iizuka; Satoko Nakada; Sohuske Yamada
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2019-01-16

10.  Invasive adenoma and pituitary carcinoma: a SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Tara M Hansen; Sachin Batra; Michael Lim; Gary L Gallia; Peter C Burger; Roberto Salvatori; Gary Wand; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Lawrence Kleinberg; Kristin J Redmond
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.