Literature DB >> 20865882

What are we telling our patients? A survey of risk disclosure for anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand.

A R Braun1, K Leslie, A F Merry, D Story.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to determine the range of risks disclosed in four commonly-encountered clinical scenarios: knee arthroscopy, lumbar laminectomy, laparoscopic appendicectomy and laparotomy, and then to determine how often five commonly-disclosed risks were disclosed for each scenario. We conducted a pilot survey of consultant anaesthetists in the Auckland City Hospital, the Royal Melbourne Hospital and the Austin Hospital (response rate 59%). A web survey was then sent to 500 randomly-selected Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Fellows (response rate 29%). In the pilot survey, a wide range of risks were disclosed: five (range 0 to 13) for knee arthroscopy, seven (0 to 16) for lumbar laminectomy, six (0 to 13) for appendicectomy and nine (0 to 24) for laparotomy. In the web survey the disclosure rates for all risks varied widely from "rarely" to "always". Respondents were more likely to disclose risks infrequently if they were male (odds ratio 5.7, P = 0.002) or exclusively in private practice (odds ratio 4.1, P = 0.02). Age > 45 years was not associated with disclosure frequency (odds ratio 1.65, P = 0.23). While the low response rate limits the validity and generalisability of many of our findings, we can nevertheless confidently conclude that risk disclosure varies widely in Australia and New Zealand. This large variation should be of concern to all anaesthetists. More work is needed to understand the reasons for this variation, and to develop a stronger consensus among anaesthetists about what risks should be disclosed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20865882     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1003800520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  3 in total

1.  Patient perceptions and recall of consent for regional anaesthesia compared with consent for surgery.

Authors:  Roxaneh Zarnegar; Matthew R D Brown; Matthew Henley; Victoria Tidman; Ahilan Pathmanathan
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Evaluation of anesthesia informed consent in pediatric practice - An observation cohort study.

Authors:  Ekta Rai; Regina Yu Ying Chen; Chia S Noi; Hwan I Hee
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

3.  Health care professionals' knowledge of commonly used sedative, analgesic and neuromuscular drugs: A single center (Rambam Health Care Campus), prospective, observational survey.

Authors:  Danny Epstein; Yaniv Steinfeld; Erez Marcusohn; Hanna Ammouri; Asaf Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.