Literature DB >> 20864899

Exploring the critical distance and position relationships between the Eustachian tube and the internal carotid artery.

Michael Bergin1, Philip Bird, Ian Cowan, John F Pearson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic surgery to the nasopharyngeal portion of the Eustachian tube (ET) has been advocated for ET dysfunction. It is therefore essential to understand the relationship between the ET and the internal carotid artery (ICA) from an endoscopic perspective. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective database review.
SETTING: Tertiary and University Hospital. PATIENTS: General population undergoing cervical CT scanning. INTERVENTION(S): 397 sides were reviewed in 200 CT scans. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Measurements were taken from the anterosuperior ET torus to the ICA and from the fossa of Rosenmüller (FR) to the ICA. The data were analyzed for any minimum "safe distance." The ICA variability was further investigated by its distance from the midline, and the angle the midline makes with a line drawn from the ET to the ICA. The artery was assessed for an aberrant path.
RESULTS: The minimum distance from ET to ICA was 10.4 mm (average 23.5 mm). The predicted "safe distance" decreases with age from 8.0 mm to 5.4 mm in females and 10.2 to 7.8 mm in males. FR to ICA distance was very small in some patients (minimum 0.2 mm). The ICA was an average 23.7 mm from the midline (minimum 11.5 mm). The ET/ICA/midline angle varied from 17.0- to 53.6- (average 37.7-). 36% have at least 1 aberrant ICA. These patients have significantly shorter ET/ICA distances (95% CI 0.4 Y 2.2 mm, p = 0.004).
CONCLUSION: The distance from ICA to ET varies between males and females. There is no safe distance from FR to ICA. Patients with an aberrant ICA have shorter distances, so contrast CT scanning is advised prior to surgery so that each patient's own carotid anatomy may be known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20864899     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f6c880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

1.  Critical distance between the cartilaginous Eustachian tube and the internal carotid artery.

Authors:  Heidi Olander; Jorma Järnstedt; Dennis Poe; Ilkka Kivekäs
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [Eustachian tube function tests: an update].

Authors:  E F N Di Martino
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Role of imaging before Eustachian tube dilation using the Bielefeld balloon catheter].

Authors:  M Tisch; P Störrle; B Danz; H Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Anatomy of the eustachian tube].

Authors:  A Böckers
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Johann Christian Rosenmüller (1771-1820): A Historical Perspective on the Man behind the Fossa.

Authors:  Chiazo Amene; Maura Cosetti; Sudheer Ambekar; Bharat Guthikonda; Anil Nanda
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-05-16

Review 6.  Carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: Risk factors, prevention, and management.

Authors:  Rahul K Sharma; Alexandria L Irace; Jonathan B Overdevest; David A Gudis
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  Risk factors for internal carotid artery injury in adults during simple nasopharyngeal surgeries.

Authors:  Ching-Feng Lien; Hsu-Huei Weng; Ching-Feng Liu; Bor-Shyh Lin; Tai-Ching Wu; Yung-Song Lin
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Evidence and evidence gaps in the treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction and otitis media.

Authors:  Magnus Teschner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.