Nitin Kapur1, John P Masel2, Debbie Watson2, Ian B Masters3, Anne B Chang4. 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD; Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD; Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia. Electronic address: dr.nitinkapur@gmail.com. 2. Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD. 3. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD; Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD. 4. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD; Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, The University of Queensland, Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD; Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The radiologic definition of airway dilatation and bronchiectasis in children has substantial limitations. Bronchoarterial (BA) ratio is a commonly used criterion to define airway dilatation despite the lack of normative pediatric data. The objective of our study was to determine the range of normal bronchial to accompanying arterial diameter ratio on high-resolution CT scan of the chest in children and compare it with the available adult data. METHODS: Children undergoing multidetector CT scan of the chest for nonpulmonary conditions at a single center were prospectively identified. High-resolution reconstruction was performed on those included and both airway lumen and vessel diameters were measured in the upper and lower lobes of both lungs. Mean BA ratio was calculated for each included child, and its correlation with age was assessed. RESULTS: Forty-one children were included; the mean (SD) BA ratio was 0.626 (0.068) (range, 0.437-0.739). This ratio was lower than comparable adult data (combined mean [SD], 0.676 [0.12]; P = .01). No correlation was found with age in our cohort (r = -0.21, P = .19). There was no difference in the ratio based on laterality or lobe. CONCLUSIONS: In the pediatric age group, the airway is significantly smaller than the adjoining vessel. Using the radiologic criteria of BA ratio > 1 to define bronchial dilatation would underestimate the presence and extent of bronchiectasis, leading to delayed and missed diagnosis. This highlights the need to redefine the criteria for bronchial dilatation in children.
BACKGROUND: The radiologic definition of airway dilatation and bronchiectasis in children has substantial limitations. Bronchoarterial (BA) ratio is a commonly used criterion to define airway dilatation despite the lack of normative pediatric data. The objective of our study was to determine the range of normal bronchial to accompanying arterial diameter ratio on high-resolution CT scan of the chest in children and compare it with the available adult data. METHODS:Children undergoing multidetector CT scan of the chest for nonpulmonary conditions at a single center were prospectively identified. High-resolution reconstruction was performed on those included and both airway lumen and vessel diameters were measured in the upper and lower lobes of both lungs. Mean BA ratio was calculated for each included child, and its correlation with age was assessed. RESULTS: Forty-one children were included; the mean (SD) BA ratio was 0.626 (0.068) (range, 0.437-0.739). This ratio was lower than comparable adult data (combined mean [SD], 0.676 [0.12]; P = .01). No correlation was found with age in our cohort (r = -0.21, P = .19). There was no difference in the ratio based on laterality or lobe. CONCLUSIONS: In the pediatric age group, the airway is significantly smaller than the adjoining vessel. Using the radiologic criteria of BA ratio > 1 to define bronchial dilatation would underestimate the presence and extent of bronchiectasis, leading to delayed and missed diagnosis. This highlights the need to redefine the criteria for bronchial dilatation in children.
Authors: Emily M DeBoer; Waldemar Swiercz; Sonya L Heltshe; Margaret M Anthony; Paul Szefler; Rebecca Klein; John Strain; Alan S Brody; Scott D Sagel Journal: Chest Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Lee Gazourian; Samuel Ash; Emily E K Meserve; Alejandro Diaz; Raul San Jose Estepar; Souheil Y El-Chemaly; Ivan O Rosas; Miguel Divo; Anne L Fuhlbrigge; Phillip C Camp; Vincent T Ho; Ami S Bhatt; Hilary J Goldberg; Lynette M Sholl; George R Washko Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Anne B Chang; Robyn L Marsh; John W Upham; Lucas R Hoffman; Heidi Smith-Vaughan; Deborah Holt; Maree Toombs; Catherine Byrnes; Stephanie T Yerkovich; Paul J Torzillo; Kerry-Ann F O'Grady; Keith Grimwood Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Lena P Thia; Alistair Calder; Janet Stocks; Andrew Bush; Catherine M Owens; Colin Wallis; Carolyn Young; Yvonne Sullivan; Angie Wade; Angus McEwan; Alan S Brody Journal: Thorax Date: 2013-10-16 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Danielle F Wurzel; Ian M Mackay; Julie M Marchant; Claire Y T Wang; Stephanie T Yerkovich; John W Upham; Heidi C Smith-Vaughan; Helen L Petsky; Anne B Chang Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 9.079