OBJECTIVE: This article presents the development of a new smoking status, the "phantom smokers," who do not view themselves as smokers but report smoking cigarettes. PARTICIPANTS: Students from 2 universities in Michigan (N = 899; October 2005) and Florida (N = 1,517; May 2006) participated in surveys. METHODS: Respondents in Michigan completed measures regarding smoking status and tobacco use, and respondents in Florida completed measures regarding smoking status, tobacco use, smoking consequences, and norms. RESULTS: The studies identify the incidence of phantom smokers (29.6% in Michigan and 5.5% in Florida). Different questions resulted in different smoking rates. Phantom smokers expect more negative affect reduction and social facilitation from smoking than nonsmokers. Phantom smokers display ambivalent attitudes toward a typical smoker's image. They experience less pressure to change their smoking behavior than smokers. CONCLUSION: Phantom smokers' dissociation from smokers should be recognized and targeted as a distinct group for antismoking messages.
OBJECTIVE: This article presents the development of a new smoking status, the "phantom smokers," who do not view themselves as smokers but report smoking cigarettes. PARTICIPANTS: Students from 2 universities in Michigan (N = 899; October 2005) and Florida (N = 1,517; May 2006) participated in surveys. METHODS: Respondents in Michigan completed measures regarding smoking status and tobacco use, and respondents in Florida completed measures regarding smoking status, tobacco use, smoking consequences, and norms. RESULTS: The studies identify the incidence of phantom smokers (29.6% in Michigan and 5.5% in Florida). Different questions resulted in different smoking rates. Phantom smokers expect more negative affect reduction and social facilitation from smoking than nonsmokers. Phantom smokers display ambivalent attitudes toward a typical smoker's image. They experience less pressure to change their smoking behavior than smokers. CONCLUSION: Phantom smokers' dissociation from smokers should be recognized and targeted as a distinct group for antismoking messages.
Authors: Kim Pulvers; Taneisha S Scheuermann; Devan R Romero; Brittany Basora; Xianghua Luo; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Amanda L Johnson; Jessica M Rath; Valerie Williams; Donna M Vallone; David B Abrams; Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Chia-Kuei Lee; Colleen Corte; Karen F Stein; Lorna Finnegan; Linda L McCreary; Chang G Park Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2014-12-31 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Julia Kim; Yasaman Kambari; Anmol Taggar; Lena C Quilty; Peter Selby; Fernando Caravaggio; Fumihiko Ueno; Jianmeng Song; Bruce G Pollock; Ariel Graff-Guerrero; Philip Gerretsen Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Andrea C Villanti; Michelle T Bover Manderski; Daniel A Gundersen; Michael B Steinberg; Cristine D Delnevo Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Ildiko Tombor; Lion Shahab; Aleksandra Herbec; Joanne Neale; Susan Michie; Robert West Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 4.267