Literature DB >> 20864361

A two-stage percutaneous approach to charcot diabetic foot reconstruction.

Bradley M Lamm1, H David Gottlieb, Dror Paley.   

Abstract

The goals of Charcot deformity correction are to restore osseous alignment, regain pedal stability, and prevent ulceration. Traditional reconstructive surgical approaches involve large, open incisions to remove bone and the use of internal fixation to attempt to fuse dislocated joints. Such operations can result in shortening of the foot and/or incomplete deformity correction, fixation failure, incision healing problems, infection, and the longterm use of casts or braces. We recommend a minimally invasive surgical technique for the treatment of Charcot deformity, which we performed on 11 feet in 8 patients. Osseous realignment was achieved through gradual distraction of the joints with external fixation, after which minimally invasive arthrodesis was performed with rigid internal fixation. Feet were operated on at various stages of Charcot deformity: Eichenholtz stage I (1 foot), Eichenholtz stage II (6 feet), and Eichenholtz stage III (4 feet). When comparing the average change in preoperative and postoperative radiographic angles, the transverse plane talar-first metatarsal angle (P = .02), sagittal plane talar-first metatarsal angle (P = .008), and calcaneal pitch angle (P = .001) were all found to be statistically significant. Complications included 3 operative adjustments of external or internal fixation, 4 broken wires or half-pins, 2 broken rings, and 11 pin tract infections. Most notably, no deep infection, no screw failure, and no recurrent ulcerations occurred and no amputations were necessary during an average follow-up of 22 months. Gradual Charcot foot correction with the Taylor spatial frame plus minimally invasive arthrodesis is an effective treatment.
Copyright © 2010 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20864361     DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1067-2516            Impact factor:   1.286


  6 in total

1.  Charcot foot reconstruction outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joon Ha; Thomas Hester; Robert Foley; Ines L H Reichert; Prashanth R J Vas; Raju Ahluwalia; Venu Kavarthapu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-04-20

2.  Late corrective arthrodesis in nonplantigrade diabetic charcot midfoot disease is associated with high complication and reoperation rates.

Authors:  Anica Eschler; Georg Gradl; Annekatrin Wussow; Thomas Mittlmeier
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 4.011

3.  Corneal Subbasal Nerve Plexus Changes in Severe Diabetic Charcot Foot Deformity: A Pilot Study in Search for a DNOAP Biomarker.

Authors:  Anica Herlyn; Ruby Kala Prakasam; Sabine Peschel; Stephan Allgeier; Bernd Köhler; Karsten Winter; Rudolf F Guthoff; Thomas Mittlmeier; Oliver Stachs
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 4.011

4.  [Anatomical calcaneal external fixator self-designed according to the morphology of heel].

Authors:  Shen Xia; Zeyu Zhao; Yongqing Xu; Qian Lü; Shaoquan Pu; Hanfen Chen; Xin Qi; Yueliang Zhu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-04-15

5.  Charcot neuroarthropathy: realignment of diabetic foot by means of osteosynthesis using intramedullary screws - case report.

Authors:  Alexandre Leme Godoy Dos Santos; Rômulo Ballarin Albino; Rafael Trevisan Ortiz; Marcos Hideyo Sakaki; Marcos de Andrade Corsato; Tulio Diniz Fernandes
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-08-28

6.  Prediction of complications in a high-risk cohort of patients undergoing corrective arthrodesis of late stage Charcot deformity based on the PEDIS score.

Authors:  Anica Eschler; Georg Gradl; Annekatrin Wussow; Thomas Mittlmeier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.