BACKGROUND: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions within the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway as a critical modulator of cell survival. On the basis of promising preclinical data, the safety and tolerability of therapy with the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 in combination with radiation (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) was evaluated in this Phase I study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients received weekly oral RAD001 in combination with standard chemoradiotherapy, followed by RAD001 in combination with standard adjuvant temozolomide. RAD001 was dose escalated in cohorts of 6 patients. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined during RAD001 combination therapy with TMZ/RT. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 8.4 months. Combined therapy was well tolerated at all dose levels, with 1 patient on each dose level experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity: Grade 3 fatigue, Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, and Grade 4 liver dysfunction. Throughout therapy, there were no Grade 5 events, 3 patients experienced Grade 4 toxicities, and 6 patients had Grade 3 toxicities attributable to treatment. On the basis of these results, the recommended Phase II dosage currently being tested is RAD001 70 mg/week in combination with standard chemoradiotherapy. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography scans also were obtained at baseline and after the second RAD001 dose before the initiation of TMZ/RT; the change in FDG uptake between scans was calculated for each patient. Fourteen patients had stable metabolic disease, and 4 patients had a partial metabolic response. CONCLUSIONS: RAD001 in combination with RT/TMZ and adjuvant TMZ was reasonably well tolerated. Changes in tumor metabolism can be detected by FDG positron emission tomography in a subset of patients within days of initiating RAD001 therapy.
BACKGROUND: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions within the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway as a critical modulator of cell survival. On the basis of promising preclinical data, the safety and tolerability of therapy with the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 in combination with radiation (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) was evaluated in this Phase I study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients received weekly oral RAD001 in combination with standard chemoradiotherapy, followed by RAD001 in combination with standard adjuvant temozolomide. RAD001 was dose escalated in cohorts of 6 patients. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined during RAD001 combination therapy with TMZ/RT. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 8.4 months. Combined therapy was well tolerated at all dose levels, with 1 patient on each dose level experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity: Grade 3 fatigue, Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, and Grade 4 liver dysfunction. Throughout therapy, there were no Grade 5 events, 3 patients experienced Grade 4 toxicities, and 6 patients had Grade 3 toxicities attributable to treatment. On the basis of these results, the recommended Phase II dosage currently being tested is RAD001 70 mg/week in combination with standard chemoradiotherapy. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography scans also were obtained at baseline and after the second RAD001 dose before the initiation of TMZ/RT; the change in FDG uptake between scans was calculated for each patient. Fourteen patients had stable metabolic disease, and 4 patients had a partial metabolic response. CONCLUSIONS: RAD001 in combination with RT/TMZ and adjuvant TMZ was reasonably well tolerated. Changes in tumor metabolism can be detected by FDG positron emission tomography in a subset of patients within days of initiating RAD001 therapy.
Authors: Paul D Brown; Sunil Krishnan; Jann N Sarkaria; Wenting Wu; Kurt A Jaeckle; Joon H Uhm; Francois J Geoffroy; Robert Arusell; Gaspar Kitange; Robert B Jenkins; John W Kugler; Roscoe F Morton; Kendrith M Rowland; Paul Mischel; William H Yong; Bernd W Scheithauer; David Schiff; Caterina Giannini; Jan C Buckner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: James D Murphy; Aaron C Spalding; Yash R Somnay; Sonja Markwart; Michael E Ray; Daniel A Hamstra Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Wen Wee Ma; Heather Jacene; Dongweon Song; Felip Vilardell; Wells A Messersmith; Dan Laheru; Richard Wahl; Chris Endres; Antonio Jimeno; Martin G Pomper; Manuel Hidalgo Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anne O'Donnell; Sandrine Faivre; Howard A Burris; Daniel Rea; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Nicholas Shand; Heidi A Lane; Katharine Hazell; Ulrike Zoellner; John M Kovarik; Cathryn Brock; Suzanne Jones; Eric Raymond; Ian Judson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Chiaki Tanaka; Terence O'Reilly; John M Kovarik; Nicholas Shand; Katharine Hazell; Ian Judson; Eric Raymond; Sabine Zumstein-Mecker; Christine Stephan; Anne Boulay; Marc Hattenberger; George Thomas; Heidi A Lane Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David B Shackelford; Debbie S Vasquez; Jacqueline Corbeil; Shulin Wu; Mathias Leblanc; Chin-Lee Wu; David R Vera; Reuben J Shaw Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: D Cejka; C Kuntner; M Preusser; M Fritzer-Szekeres; B J Fueger; S Strommer; J Werzowa; T Fuereder; T Wanek; M Zsebedics; M Mueller; O Langer; V Wacheck Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Myriam M Chaumeil; Tomoko Ozawa; IlWoo Park; Kristen Scott; C David James; Sarah J Nelson; Sabrina M Ronen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-07-23 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Prakash Chinnaiyan; Minhee Won; Patrick Y Wen; Amyn M Rojiani; Maria Werner-Wasik; Helen A Shih; Lynn S Ashby; Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu; Volker W Stieber; Shawn C Malone; John B Fiveash; Nimish A Mohile; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Merideth M Wendland; Philip J Stella; Andrew Y Kee; Minesh P Mehta Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 12.300