| Literature DB >> 20863623 |
Niels W C J van de Donk1, Henk M Lokhorst, Meletios Dimopoulos, Michele Cavo, Gareth Morgan, Hermann Einsele, Martin Kropff, Steve Schey, Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Heinz Ludwig, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Pieter Sonneveld, Hans E Johnsen, Joan Bladé, Jesús F San-Miguel, Antonio Palumbo.
Abstract
The introduction of the Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors, used either as a single-agent or combined with classic anti-myeloma therapies, has improved the outcome for patients with relapsed myeloma. However, there is currently no generally accepted standard treatment for relapsed/refractory myeloma patients, partly because of the absence of trials comparing the efficacy of the novel agents in relapsed/refractory myeloma. Choice of a new treatment regimen depends on both patient and disease-specific characteristics. A lenalidomide-based regimen is the first choice in patients with neuropathy, while bortezomib has the highest efficacy in patients with renal insufficiency and is not associated with increased risk of thromboembolism. A second autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) can be applied in patients with a progression-free period of ≥ 18-24 months after the first auto-SCT. In high-risk relapse such as occurring early after auto-SCT consolidation with allogeneic SCT can be considered. In this review we provide an overview of the various salvage regimens and give recommendations for treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma in different clinical settings.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20863623 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.08.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Treat Rev ISSN: 0305-7372 Impact factor: 12.111