Literature DB >> 20863582

Plasma osteopontin reveals left ventricular reverse remodelling following cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure.

Pietro Francia1, Cristina Balla, Agnese Ricotta, Arianna Uccellini, Alessandra Frattari, Anna Modestino, Marina Borro, Maurizio Simmaco, Adriano Salvati, Luciano De Biase, Massimo Volpe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) promotes left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling and affects myocardial collagen turnover in heart failure (HF) patients. Osteopontin (OPN) is a matrix glycoprotein required for the activation of fibroblasts upon TGF-β1 stimulation. In humans, plasma OPN and OPN-expressing lymphocytes correlate with the severity of HF. We sought to evaluate whether plasma OPN and TGF-β1 reflect LV reverse remodelling following CRT.
METHODS: Eighteen patients (12 men, mean age 65 ± 11 years) undergoing CRT were studied. Patients underwent baseline clinical and echocardiographic evaluation, and assessment of plasma OPN and TGF-β1. The evaluation was repeated 8.5 ± 4 months after device implantation. Eight healthy age- and sex-matched subjects served as controls.
RESULTS: In HF patients, baseline plasma OPN and TGF-β1 were higher as compared to control subjects (OPN: 99 ± 48 vs 59 ± 22 ng/ml; p<0.05; TGF-β1: 15.9 ± 8.0 vs 9.3 ± 5.6 ng/ml; p<0.05). At follow-up, 12 patients responded to CRT and showed LV reverse remodelling, whereas 6 did not. Plasma OPN decreased in CRT responders (108 ± 47 vs 84 ± 37 ng/ml; p=0.03) and increased in non-responders (79 ± 58 vs 115 ± 63 ng/ml; p<0.01). TGF-β1 showed a trend towards reduction in responders (17.5 ± 8.7 vs 10.2 ± 8.9 ng/ml; p=0.08) and was unchanged in non-responders. A significant correlation (r=-0.56; p=0.01) was found between relative changes of LVESV and plasma OPN.
CONCLUSIONS: CRT-induced LV reverse remodelling is reflected by changes in plasma OPN. Circulating OPN may represent a marker of LV dilation/impairment and an indicator of the response to HF therapies promoting LV reverse remodelling.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20863582     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  12 in total

1.  Left ventricular reverse remodeling is not related to biopsy-detected extracellular matrix fibrosis and serum markers of fibrosis in dilated cardiomyopathy, regardless of the definition used for LVRR.

Authors:  Paweł Rubiś; Sylwia Wiśniowska-Śmiałek; Barbara Biernacka-Fijałkowska; Lucyna Rudnicka-Sosin; Ewa Wypasek; Artur Kozanecki; Ewa Dziewięcka; Patrycja Faltyn; Aleksandra Karabinowska; Lusine Khachatryan; Marta Hlawaty; Agata Leśniak-Sobelga; Magdalena Kostkiewicz; Wojciech Płazak; Piotr Podolec
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Diagnosing destabilized heart failure in the emergency setting: current and future biomarker tests.

Authors:  Damien Gruson; Frédéric Thys; Franck Verschuren
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Effects of continuous-flow versus pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices on myocardial unloading and remodeling.

Authors:  Tomoko S Kato; Aalap Chokshi; Parvati Singh; Tuba Khawaja; Faisal Cheema; Hirokazu Akashi; Khurram Shahzad; Shinichi Iwata; Shunichi Homma; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Ulrich Jorde; Maryjane Farr; Donna M Mancini; P Christian Schulze
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 8.790

4.  Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing.

Authors:  Jingfeng Wang; Zhenning Nie; Haiyan Chen; Xianhong Shu; Zhaohua Yang; Ruiming Yao; Yangang Su; Junbo Ge
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 5.  Sex differences in device therapy for heart failure: utilization, outcomes, and adverse events.

Authors:  Naomi D Herz; Joseph Engeda; Robbert Zusterzeel; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; David G Strauss; Samantha B Jacobs; Kimberly A Selzman; Ileana L Piña; Daniel A Caños
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Biomarkers in electrophysiology: role in arrhythmias and resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Abhishek Bose; Quynh A Truong; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Serum osteopontin, but not OPN gene polymorphism, is associated with LVH in essential hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Xuwei Hou; Zhaohui Hu; Xiaohua Huang; Yan Chen; Xiuying He; Haiying Xu; Ningfu Wang
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Novel cardiac-specific biomarkers and the cardiovascular continuum.

Authors:  Efstathios Vassiliadis; Natasha Barascuk; Athanasios Didangelos; Morten A Karsdal
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2012-05-02

Review 9.  Usefulness of Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Mohammad H Asgardoon; Ali Vasheghani-Farahani; Alborz Sherafati
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2020

10.  Assessment of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and osteopontin in a healthy pediatric population.

Authors:  Joshua D Chew; Larry Markham; Holly M Smith; Yan Ru Su; Kelsey Tomasek; James C Slaughter; Douglas Sawyer; Jonathan H Soslow
Journal:  J Circ Biomark       Date:  2018-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.