Literature DB >> 20862460

Catching a gently thrown ball.

Joan López-Moliner1, Eli Brenner, Stefan Louw, Jeroen B J Smeets.   

Abstract

Several studies have shown that people can catch a ball even if it is visible only during part of its flight. Here, we examine how well they can do so. We measured the movements of a ball and of the hands of both the thrower and the catcher during one-handed underarm throwing and catching. The catcher's sight was occluded for 250 ms at random moments. Participants could catch most balls without fumbling. They only really had difficulties if vision was occluded before the ball was released and was restored less than 200 ms before the catch. In such cases, it was impossible to accurately predict the ball's trajectory from motion of the ball and of the thrower's hand before the occlusion, and there was not enough time to adjust the catching movement after vision was restored. Even at these limits, people caught most balls quite adequately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20862460     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2421-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  Movement reversals in ball catching.

Authors:  G Montagne; M Laurent; A Durey; R Bootsma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex.

Authors:  Iole Indovina; Vincenzo Maffei; Gianfranco Bosco; Myrka Zago; Emiliano Macaluso; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Batting with occluded vision: an in situ examination of the information pick-up and interceptive skills of high- and low-skilled cricket batsmen.

Authors:  Sean Müller; Bruce Abernethy
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 4.319

4.  How do world-class cricket batsmen anticipate a bowler's intention?

Authors:  Sean Müller; Bruce Abernethy; Damian Farrow
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Visual occlusion factors in a discrete ball-catching task.

Authors:  H T Whiting; R H Sharp
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 6.  Visual factors in hitting and catching.

Authors:  D Regan
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Visual reaction time and high-speed ball games.

Authors:  P McLeod
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time.

Authors:  L Peper; R J Bootsma; D R Mestre; F C Bakker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Timing the Selection of Information During Rhythmic Catching.

Authors:  Eric L. Amazeen; Polemnia G. Amazeen; Auke A. Post; Peter J. Beek
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.328

10.  Visuomotor transformation for interception: catching while fixating.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; C E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  20 in total

1.  Anticipatory gaze strategies when grasping moving objects.

Authors:  Melissa C Bulloch; Steven L Prime; Jonathan J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Memory and prediction in natural gaze control.

Authors:  Gabriel Diaz; Joseph Cooper; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Eye movements and manual interception of ballistic trajectories: effects of law of motion perturbations and occlusions.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action.

Authors:  Huaiyong Zhao; William H Warren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  People favour imperfect catching by assuming a stable world.

Authors:  Joan López-Moliner; Matthias S Keil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Filling gaps in visual motion for target capture.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Silvio Gravano; Iole Indovina; Barbara La Scaleia; Vincenzo Maffei; Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-23

7.  Gaze behavior in one-handed catching and its relation with interceptive performance: what the eyes can't tell.

Authors:  Benedetta Cesqui; Maura Mezzetti; Francesco Lacquaniti; Andrea d'Avella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  How Can People Be so Good at Intercepting Accelerating Objects if They Are so Poor at Visually Judging Acceleration?

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Inés Abalo Rodriguez; Victor Estal Muñoz; Sabine Schootemeijer; Yannick Mahieu; Kirsten Veerkamp; Marit Zandbergen; Tim van der Zee; Jeroen Bj Smeets
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-01-27

9.  Synergies between optical and physical variables in intercepting parabolic targets.

Authors:  José Gómez; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Potential Systematic Interception Errors are Avoided When Tracking the Target with One's Eyes.

Authors:  Cristina de la Malla; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.