| Literature DB >> 20862365 |
Mary T Donofrio1, An N Massaro.
Abstract
Advances in cardiac surgical techniques and perioperative intensive care have led to improved survival in babies with congenital heart disease (CHD). While it is true that the majority of children with CHD today will survive, many will have impaired neurodevelopmental outcome across a wide spectrum of domains. While continuing to improve short-term morbidity and mortality is an important goal, recent and ongoing research has focused on defining the impact of CHD on brain development, minimizing postnatal brain injury, and improving long-term outcomes. This paper will review the impact that CHD has on the developing brain of the fetus and infant. Neurologic abnormalities detectable prior to surgery will be described. Potential etiologies of these findings will be discussed, including altered fetal intrauterine growth, cerebral blood flow and brain development, associated congenital brain abnormalities, and risk for postnatal brain injury. Finally, reported neurodevelopmental outcomes after surgical repair of CHD will be reviewed.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20862365 PMCID: PMC2938447 DOI: 10.1155/2010/359390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Pediatr ISSN: 1687-9740
Figure 1(a) Normal fetal blood flow. (b) Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. (c) left ventricular outflow obstruction. (d) Transposition of the Great Arteries. (e) tetralogy of fallot. (f) hypoplastic right heart. Red arrows: oxygenated blood; blue arrows: deoxygenated blood.
Doppler indices of cerebral blood flow.
| Doppler Ultrasound Finding | Definition | Significance | Congenital Heart Disease |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cerebral Pulsatility Index (CPI) | (SV-DV)/MV | Lower value associated with higher mortality, growth retardation, and poor neurological outcome | Lower in HLHS and higher in right-sided obstruction lesions compared to normal [ |
|
| |||
| Cerebral Resistance Index (CRI) | (SV-DV)/SV | Lower value associated with growth retardation | Lower in CHD infants compared to normal [ |
|
| |||
| Cerebral/Umbilical Pulsatility Ratio | CPI/UPI | Ratio <1 associated with growth retardation and poor perinatal outcome | No difference [ |
|
| |||
| Cerebral/Umbilical Resistance Ratio | CRI/URI | Ratio <1 associated with growth retardation | Lower in CHD infants compared to normal |
|
| |||
| Reversal of diastolic flow in the aortic isthmus | Blood flow away from the descending aorta | Predicts poor neurological outcome | Present in HLHS and severe left ventricular (LV) outflow obstruction with LV failure |
Figure 2Cerebral to placental resistance ratio versus gestational age for normal fetuses and fetuses with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD). *P is significant normal versus CHD.
Reported long-term cognitive outcomes for patients with congenital heart disease.
| Diagnosis | Reference | Number of Patients | Mean age at assessment (range) | Cohort prospectively identified | Surgical era | Full scale IQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHD-mixed | Clarkson, 1980 [ | 72 | 4y (2.4–7y) | No | 1969–71 | 93 ± 16 |
| Forbess, 2002 [ | 243 | 5 y | No | 1993–2000 | 97 ± 16 | |
| Miatton, 2007 [ | 43 | 8y | No | 1995–99 | 96 ± 15 | |
| TGA | Clarkson, 1980 [ | 22 | 4y (2.4–7y) | No | 1969–71 | 90 ± 18 |
| Newberger, 1984 [ | 33 | 5.8y (5.5–6.3y) | No | 1968–72 | 102 ± 15 | |
| Hesz, 1988 [ | 10 | (6.5–14y) | No | 1967–84 | 92 ± 12 | |
| Oates, 1995 [ | 30 | (9–10y) | No | 1972–82 | 100 ± 17 | |
| Ellerbeck, 1998 [ | 54 | 8y | No | 1981–90 | 90 ± 21 | |
| Hovels-Gurich, 1997 [ | 77 | 5 y (3–9y) | Yes | 1986–92 | 99 ± 14 | |
| Bellinger, 1999 [ | 158 | 4y | Yes | 1988–92 | 93+17 | |
| Karl, 2004 [ | 74 | 9y (4–14y) | No | 1988–94 | 102 ± 13 | |
| Brosig, 2007 [ | 13 | (3.5–6y) | No | 1996–99 | 110 (90-126) | |
| Clarkson, 1980 [ | 17 | 4y (2.4–7y) | No | 1969–71 | 88 ± 14 | |
| TOF | Oates, 1995 [ | 51 | (9–10y) | No | 1972–82 | 100 ± 17 |
| Hovels-Gurich, 2006 [ | 20 | 7y (5–12y) | Yes | 1993–99 | 91 ± 13 | |
| Miatton, 2007 [ | 18 | 8y | No | 1994–99 | 95 ± 14 | |
| Clarkson, 1980 [ | 16 | 4y (2.4–7y) | No | 1969–71 | 93 ± 15 | |
| TGA/TOF | Wright, 1994 [ | 29 | 9.5y (7–12y) | No | 1979–84 | 94 ± 15 |
| VSD | Oates, 1995 [ | 33 | (9–10y) | No | 1972–82 | 102 ± 12 |
| Hovels-Gurich, 2006 [ | 20 | 7y (5–12y) | Yes | 1993–99 | 93 ± 12 | |
| SV | Wernovsky, 2000 [ | 128 | 11y (3.7-41y) | No | 1973–91 | 96 ± 17 |
| Uzark, 1998 [ | 32 | 2.5y (1.5–9.5y) | No | 1986–94 | 98 ± 12 | |
| Goldberg, 2000 [ | 51 | 5y (2.8–8y) | No | 1989–96 | 101 ± 5 | |
| Forbess, 2002 [ | 34 | 5 y | No | 1993–2000 | 90 ± 16 | |
| HLHS | Kern, 1998 [ | 12 | 4y (3–6y) | No | 1990–96 | 80 ± 14 |
| Goldberg, 2000 [ | 26 | 5y (2.8–8y) | No | 1989–96 | 94 ± 7 | |
| Mahle, 2000 [ | 28 | 9y (6–13.6y) | No | 1984–91 | 86 (50–116) | |
| Mahle, 2006 [ | 48 | 12y (8–17y) | No | 1986–94 | 86 ± 14 | |
| Brosig, 2007 [ | 13 | (3.5–6y) | No | 1996–99 | 97 (71–112) |