| Literature DB >> 20862195 |
Alvaro Campos Cavalcanti Maciel1, Ricardo Oliveira Guerra.
Abstract
Background. Identifying the risk factors peculiar to each population has a great relevance, because it enables health policy formulators to analyze information accurately and by doing so, define objectives and action programs aimed at a qualitative and economically feasible solution to the problem. Thus, this study aimed at identifying the risk factors for survival in elderly in a city in the state of Rio Grande do Norte (RN), Brazil. Methods. A prospective study was carried out, where 310 elderly persons were selected to form a baseline. The follow-up was 53 months. The predictive variables were divided into sociodemographic, physical health, neuropsychiatric and functional capacity. Statistical analysis was performed using bivariate analysis, survival analysis, followed by Cox regression in the multivariate analysis. Results. A total of 60 (19.3%) elderly individuals died during the follow-up. The survival mean was 24.8 months. In the Cox analysis, dependence in basic activities of daily living (HR = 3.55), cognitive deficit (HR = 4.22) and stroke (HR = 3.35) continued as independent risk factors for death. Discussion. The risk factors found in the study can be interpreted as the primary predictors for death among elderly members of the community.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20862195 PMCID: PMC2938423 DOI: 10.1155/2010/127605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res ISSN: 1687-7063
Distribution of vital status, according to sociodemographic variables of elderly residents in Santa Cruz, Brazil.
| Variables | Vital status |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Living | Dead | ||||
|
| % |
| % | ||
| Age | |||||
| 60–75 years | 148 | 90.2 | 16 | 9.8 | <.001 |
| Over 75 years | 85 | 65.9 | 44 | 34.1 | |
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 83 | 79.0 | 22 | 21.0 | .88 |
| Female | 150 | 79.8 | 38 | 20.2 | |
| Race | |||||
| White | 78 | 72.2 | 30 | 27.8 | .06 |
| Mixed | 132 | 83.5 | 26 | 16.5 | |
| Black | 23 | 85.2 | 4 | 14.8 | |
| Schooling | |||||
| Illiterate/semi-illiterate | 88 | 75.2 | 29 | 24.8 | .13 |
| Literate | 145 | 82.4 | 31 | 17.6 | |
| Marital status | |||||
| Married/common law | 140 | 86.4 | 22 | 13.6 | .01 |
| Single/widowed | 93 | 71.0 | 38 | 29.0 | |
| Leisure activities | |||||
| Yes | 125 | 89.9 | 14 | 10.1 | <.001 |
| No | 108 | 70.1 | 10 | 21.3 | |
Distribution of vital status, according to physical health variables of elderly residents in Santa Cruz, Brazil.
| Variables | Vital status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Living | Dead |
| |||
|
| % |
| % | ||
| Diabetes melitus | |||||
| Yes | 35 | 76.1 | 11 | 23.9 | .53 |
| No | 198 | 80.2 | 49 | 19.8 | |
| Cardiovascular disease | |||||
| Yes | 111 | 78.2 | 31 | 21.8 | .57 |
| No | 122 | 80.8 | 29 | 19.2 | |
| Stroke | |||||
| Yes | 9 | 37.5 | 15 | 62.5 | .001 |
| No | 224 | 83.3 | 45 | 16.7 | |
| Pulmonary diseases | |||||
| Yes | 18 | 58.1 | 13 | 41.9 | .002 |
| No | 215 | 82.1 | 47 | 17.9 | |
| Hip fracture | |||||
| Yes | 4 | 33.3 | 8 | 66.7 | <.001 |
| No | 229 | 81.5 | 52 | 18.5 | |
| Rheumatism | |||||
| Yes | 122 | 77.7 | 35 | 22.3 | .40 |
| No | 111 | 81.6 | 25 | 18.4 | |
| Visual impairment | |||||
| Yes | 176 | 76.2 | 55 | 23.8 | .06 |
| No | 57 | 91.9 | 5 | 8.1 | |
| Auditory impairment | |||||
| Yes | 83 | 72.2 | 32 | 27.8 | .01 |
| No | 150 | 84.3 | 28 | 15.7 | |
| Cancer | |||||
| Yes | 6 | 66.7 | 3 | 33.3 | .33 |
| No | 227 | 79.9 | 57 | 20.1 | |
| Self-perception of health | |||||
| Satisfied | 120 | 92.3 | 10 | 7.7 | .001 |
| Unsatisfied | 97 | 73.5 | 35 | 26.5 | |
| Number of medications | |||||
| None/one | 179 | 84.4 | 33 | 15.6 | .001 |
| More than one | 54 | 66.7 | 27 | 33.3 | |
| No of hospitalizations (in the last year) | |||||
| None | 222 | 88.2 | 48 | 17.8 | .001 |
| One or more | 11 | 47.8 | 12 | 52.2 | |
Distribution of vital status, according to neuropsychiatric and functional capacity variables of elderly residents in Santa Cruz, Brazil.
| Variables | Vital status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Living | Dead |
| |||
|
| % |
| % | ||
| Cognitive function | |||||
| Altered | 33 | 44.6 | 41 | 55.4 | <.001 |
| Unaltered | 200 | 91.3 | 19 | 8.7 | |
| Symptoms of depression | |||||
| Present | 55 | 72.4 | 21 | 27.6 | .005 |
| Absent | 176 | 86.7 | 27 | 13.3 | |
| BADL | |||||
| Dependence | 15 | 37.5 | 25 | 62.5 | <.001 |
| Independence | 218 | 86.2 | 35 | 13.8 | |
Figure 1The Kaplan-Meier curve for ABDL according to the two groups, during the follow-up period.
Figure 2The Kaplan-Meier curve for cognitive function according to the two groups, during the follow-up period.
Result of the Cox Regression, with the predicting variables of mortality of elderly from Santa Cruz, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
| Variables | Model 01 | Model 02 | Model 03 | Model 04 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | IC 95% | HR | IC 95% | HR | IC 95% | HR | IC 95% | |
| Female sex | 1.56 | 0.79–2.22 | 1.45 | 0.80–2.56 | 1.40 | 0.76–2.35 | 1.21 | 0.70–2.12 |
|
| ||||||||
| Age (years) | 1.05 | 1.01–1.10 | 1.06 | 1.03–1.12 | 1.11 | 1.01–1.24 | 1.04 | 0.99–1.09 |
|
| ||||||||
| No leisure activities | 1.41 | 0.71–2.82 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Marital status (single/widowed) | 0.95 | 0.49–1.81 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Hip fracture | 0.53 | 0.16–1.72 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Unsatisfied self-perception of health | 1.36 | 0.47–3.90 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Visual impairment | 2.12 | 0.65–4.56 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Auditory impairment | 6.56 | 0.55–14.61 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Stroke | 3.99 | 2.13–5.56 | 3.35 | 1.18–7.80 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| No of hospitalizations (more than one) | 0.59 | 0.20–1.45 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Number of medications (more than one) | 0.92 | 0.43–2.00 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Cognitive alteration | 4.22 | 2.01–8.97 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Symptoms of depression | 1.09 | 0.58–2.02 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Dependence in BADL | 3.68 | 1.95–6.77 | 3.55 | 1.77–6.45 | ||||