Literature DB >> 20861807

The value of machine perfusion perfusate biomarkers for predicting kidney transplant outcome.

Cyril Moers1, Oana C Varnav, Ernest van Heurn, Ina Jochmans, Günter R Kirste, Axel Rahmel, Henri G D Leuvenink, Jean-Paul Squifflet, Andreas Paul, Jacques Pirenne, Wim van Oeveren, Gerhard Rakhorst, Rutger J Ploeg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retrospective evidence suggests that lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, total glutathione-S-transferase (GST), alanine-aminopeptidase, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), and heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) measured during kidney machine perfusion (MP) could have predictive value for posttransplant outcome. However, these data may be biased due to organ discard based on biomarker measurements, and previous analyses were not adjusted for likely confounding factors. No reliable prospective evidence has been available so far. Nevertheless, some centers already use these biomarkers to aid decisions on accepting or discarding a donor kidney.
METHODS: From 306 deceased-donor kidneys donated after brain death or controlled cardiac death and included in an international randomized controlled trial, these six biomarkers were measured in the MP perfusate. In this unselected prospective data set, we tested whether concentrations were associated with delayed graft function, primary nonfunction, and graft survival. Multivariate regression models investigated whether the biomarkers remained independent predictors when adjusted for relevant confounding factors.
RESULTS: GST, NAG, and H-FABP were independent predictors of delayed graft function but not of primary nonfunction and graft survival. Lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine-aminopeptidase had no independent prognostic potential for any of the endpoints. Perfusate biomarker concentrations had no relevant correlation with cold ischemic time or renal vascular resistance on the pump.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased GST, NAG, or H-FABP concentrations during MP are an indication to adjust posttransplant recipient management. However, this study shows for the first time that perfusate biomarker measurements should not lead to kidney discard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20861807     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181f5c40c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  21 in total

Review 1.  New strategies to optimize kidney recovery and preservation in transplantation.

Authors:  Delphine Bon; Nicolas Chatauret; Sébastien Giraud; Raphael Thuillier; Frédéric Favreau; Thierry Hauet
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Improved approach for normothermic machine perfusion of cold stored kidney grafts.

Authors:  Charlotte von Horn; Thomas Minor
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Glutathione S-transferase iso-enzymes in perfusate from pumped kidneys are associated with delayed graft function.

Authors:  I E Hall; R S Bhangoo; P P Reese; M D Doshi; F L Weng; K Hong; H Lin; G Han; R D Hasz; M J Goldstein; B Schröppel; C R Parikh
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Presence of Cytotoxic Extracellular Histones in Machine Perfusate of Donation After Circulatory Death Kidneys.

Authors:  Tim C van Smaalen; Daniëlle M H Beurskens; E R Pieter Hoogland; Bjorn Winkens; Maarten H L Christiaans; Chris P Reutelingsperger; L W Ernest van Heurn; Gerry A F Nicolaes
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Deceased-donor kidney perfusate and urine biomarkers for kidney allograft outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ronik S Bhangoo; Isaac E Hall; Peter P Reese; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 6.  Preserving and rejuvenating old organs for transplantation: novel treatments including the potential of senolytics.

Authors:  Tomohisa Matsunaga; Maximilian J Roesel; Andreas Schroeter; Yao Xiao; Hao Zhou; Stefan G Tullius
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 2.269

7.  Machine perfusion preservation versus static cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Samuel J Tingle; Rodrigo S Figueiredo; John Ag Moir; Michael Goodfellow; David Talbot; Colin H Wilson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-15

Review 8.  Sense and Sensibilities of Organ Perfusion as a Kidney and Liver Viability Assessment Platform.

Authors:  Laurence Verstraeten; Ina Jochmans
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.782

9.  MitoQ blunts mitochondrial and renal damage during cold preservation of porcine kidneys.

Authors:  Nirmala Parajuli; Lia H Campbell; Akira Marine; Kelvin G M Brockbank; Lee Ann Macmillan-Crow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gradual Rewarming with Gradual Increase in Pressure during Machine Perfusion after Cold Static Preservation Reduces Kidney Ischemia Reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Paria Mahboub; Petra Ottens; Marc Seelen; Nils 't Hart; Nails t Hart; Harry Van Goor; Rutger Ploeg; Paulo N Martins; Paulo Martins; Henri Leuvenink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.