BACKGROUND: Commercial skin prick test (SPT) extracts used for the diagnosis of dog allergy are prepared by extracting allergens from natural sources, e.g. dog hair and dander. Due to different starting material and extraction methods used, it is likely that extracts differ regarding their allergen contents. METHODS: The total protein content and composition of dog SPT extracts from 5 European manufacturers were compared by silver-stained SDS-PAGE. Specific antibody probes were generated to detect major and minor allergens in each extract by immunoblotting. Additionally, sera of patients suffering from dog allergy were used to detect dog allergens in SPT extracts. RESULTS: SPT extracts showed a 20-fold variation regarding the total protein content. The contents of the major dog allergen Can f 1 and of Can f 2 varied considerably between the extracts. In one of the extracts, neither Can f 1 nor Can f 2 could be detected by immunoblotting. The contents of the minor dog allergen Can f 3, albumin, also showed great variability. In one of the dog SPT extracts, the presence of human serum albumin (HSA) was detected with HSA-specific antibodies. CONCLUSION: The observed variability of commercial dog SPT extracts regarding their allergen contents likely has a negative influence on the accuracy of diagnosis of dog allergy.
BACKGROUND: Commercial skin prick test (SPT) extracts used for the diagnosis of dogallergy are prepared by extracting allergens from natural sources, e.g. dog hair and dander. Due to different starting material and extraction methods used, it is likely that extracts differ regarding their allergen contents. METHODS: The total protein content and composition of dog SPT extracts from 5 European manufacturers were compared by silver-stained SDS-PAGE. Specific antibody probes were generated to detect major and minor allergens in each extract by immunoblotting. Additionally, sera of patients suffering from dogallergy were used to detect dog allergens in SPT extracts. RESULTS: SPT extracts showed a 20-fold variation regarding the total protein content. The contents of the major dog allergen Can f 1 and of Can f 2 varied considerably between the extracts. In one of the extracts, neither Can f 1 nor Can f 2 could be detected by immunoblotting. The contents of the minor dog allergen Can f 3, albumin, also showed great variability. In one of the dog SPT extracts, the presence of humanserum albumin (HSA) was detected with HSA-specific antibodies. CONCLUSION: The observed variability of commercial dog SPT extracts regarding their allergen contents likely has a negative influence on the accuracy of diagnosis of dogallergy.
Authors: Sarah K Wise; Sandra Y Lin; Elina Toskala; Richard R Orlandi; Cezmi A Akdis; Jeremiah A Alt; Antoine Azar; Fuad M Baroody; Claus Bachert; G Walter Canonica; Thomas Chacko; Cemal Cingi; Giorgio Ciprandi; Jacquelynne Corey; Linda S Cox; Peter Socrates Creticos; Adnan Custovic; Cecelia Damask; Adam DeConde; John M DelGaudio; Charles S Ebert; Jean Anderson Eloy; Carrie E Flanagan; Wytske J Fokkens; Christine Franzese; Jan Gosepath; Ashleigh Halderman; Robert G Hamilton; Hans Jürgen Hoffman; Jens M Hohlfeld; Steven M Houser; Peter H Hwang; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Deborah Jarvis; Ayesha N Khalid; Maritta Kilpeläinen; Todd T Kingdom; Helene Krouse; Desiree Larenas-Linnemann; Adrienne M Laury; Stella E Lee; Joshua M Levy; Amber U Luong; Bradley F Marple; Edward D McCoul; K Christopher McMains; Erik Melén; James W Mims; Gianna Moscato; Joaquim Mullol; Harold S Nelson; Monica Patadia; Ruby Pawankar; Oliver Pfaar; Michael P Platt; William Reisacher; Carmen Rondón; Luke Rudmik; Matthew Ryan; Joaquin Sastre; Rodney J Schlosser; Russell A Settipane; Hemant P Sharma; Aziz Sheikh; Timothy L Smith; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; Jody R Tversky; Maria C Veling; De Yun Wang; Marit Westman; Magnus Wickman; Mark Zacharek Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Véronique Schulten; April Frazier; Agustin Calatroni; Meyer Kattan; Leonard B Bacharier; George T O'Connor; Megan T Sandel; Robert A Wood; Lisa M Wheatley; Alkis Togias; Cynthia M Visness; Amy Dresen; James E Gern; Alessandro Sette Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Katharina Marth; Isabella Breyer; Margarete Focke-Tejkl; Katharina Blatt; Mohamed H Shamji; Janice Layhadi; Anna Gieras; Ines Swoboda; Domen Zafred; Walter Keller; Peter Valent; Stephen R Durham; Rudolf Valenta Journal: J Immunol Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Anna Asarnoj; Carl Hamsten; Konrad Wadén; Christian Lupinek; Niklas Andersson; Inger Kull; Mirela Curin; Josep Anto; Jean Bousquet; Rudolf Valenta; Magnus Wickman; Marianne van Hage Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: N Polovic; K Wadén; J Binnmyr; C Hamsten; R Grönneberg; C Palmberg; N Milcic-Matic; T Bergman; H Grönlund; M van Hage Journal: Allergy Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 13.146