PURPOSE: To investigate the characteristics of visual field (VF) progression in medically treated normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) patients (Koreans) with unstable ocular perfusion pressure (OPP). METHODS: One hundred one eyes of 101 NTG patients followed up for more than 4 years (mean follow-up, 6.2 years ± 12.1 months) were included. Modified Anderson criteria (MC) and linear regression analysis (LA) of VF mean deviation (MD) within the central 10° and 10° to 24° area were assessed for determining VF progression in groups with lowest (LMF) and highest (HMF) 24-hour mean OPP [MOPP = 2/3;(mean arterial pressure - IOP)] fluctuation. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare the elapsed time of confirmed VF progression in the two groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between clinical risk factors including 24-hour MOPP and central VF progression were obtained by using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Three of 33 eyes in the LMF progressed, whereas 12 of 34 eyes in the HMF progressed within the central 10° according to the MC; the between-group difference was significant (P = 0.010). By LA within the central 10°, two eyes from the LMF and nine from the HMF groups showed progression (P = 0.025). The HMF showed a greater cumulative probability of central VF progression than the LMF, by both LA and MC (Kaplan-Meier analysis, P = 0.003, 0.015, log-rank test). In multivariate analysis, only 24-hour MOPP fluctuation was significantly associated with central VF progression (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The 24-hour MOPP fluctuation was the most consistent prognostic factor among various IOP, blood pressure, and clinical factors for central VF glaucomatous progression in our series of NTG eyes.
PURPOSE: To investigate the characteristics of visual field (VF) progression in medically treated normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) patients (Koreans) with unstable ocular perfusion pressure (OPP). METHODS: One hundred one eyes of 101 NTG patients followed up for more than 4 years (mean follow-up, 6.2 years ± 12.1 months) were included. Modified Anderson criteria (MC) and linear regression analysis (LA) of VF mean deviation (MD) within the central 10° and 10° to 24° area were assessed for determining VF progression in groups with lowest (LMF) and highest (HMF) 24-hour mean OPP [MOPP = 2/3;(mean arterial pressure - IOP)] fluctuation. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare the elapsed time of confirmed VF progression in the two groups. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the association between clinical risk factors including 24-hour MOPP and central VF progression were obtained by using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Three of 33 eyes in the LMF progressed, whereas 12 of 34 eyes in the HMF progressed within the central 10° according to the MC; the between-group difference was significant (P = 0.010). By LA within the central 10°, two eyes from the LMF and nine from the HMF groups showed progression (P = 0.025). The HMF showed a greater cumulative probability of central VF progression than the LMF, by both LA and MC (Kaplan-Meier analysis, P = 0.003, 0.015, log-rank test). In multivariate analysis, only 24-hour MOPP fluctuation was significantly associated with central VF progression (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The 24-hour MOPP fluctuation was the most consistent prognostic factor among various IOP, blood pressure, and clinical factors for central VF glaucomatous progression in our series of NTG eyes.