Literature DB >> 20860717

Superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release with rapid onset: a prospective, head-to-head, placebo-controlled trial.

Steven A Kaplan1, Tim Schneider, Jenelle E Foote, Zhonghong Guan, Martin Carlsson, Jason Gong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: • To show the superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release (ER) in a placebo-controlled overactive bladder (OAB) trial with predefined treatment comparisons for both diary measures and patient-reported outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: • In this 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy trial, subjects reporting >1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode and ≥8 micturitions per 24 h at baseline were randomized to fesoterodine (4 mg for 1 week, 8 mg for 11 weeks), tolterodine ER 4 mg, or placebo. • Subjects completed 3-day bladder diaries, the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and the Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at baseline and weeks 1, 4 and 12 and the OAB Questionnaire at baseline and week 12.
RESULTS: • A total of 2417 subjects were randomized. At week 12, fesoterodine 8 mg showed superiority over tolterodine ER 4 mg and placebo on UUI episodes (primary endpoint), micturitions, urgency and most other diary endpoints, and on the PPBC, UPS and all OAB Questionnaire scales and domains (all P < 0.05). • Superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg was seen as early as week 4 (3 weeks after escalation to fesoterodine 8 mg). At week 1, fesoterodine 4 mg was superior to placebo on most diary variables, the PPBC and the UPS (all P < 0.05). Dry mouth and constipation rates were 28% and 4% with fesoterodine, 13% and 3% with tolterodine ER, and 5% and 2% with placebo. • Discontinuation rates as a result of adverse events were 5%, 3% and 2% for fesoterodine, tolterodine ER and placebo, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: • In this randomized study, which is the largest to compare antimuscarinic efficacy performed to date, fesoterodine 8 mg was superior to tolterodine ER 4 mg for UUI episodes, micturitions and urgency episodes, as well as for self-reported patient assessments of bladder-related problems, urgency, symptom bother and health-related quality of life. • The superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg was observed as early as 3 weeks after escalation from fesoterodine 4 mg for most outcomes. These data may have important implications for the clinical management of OAB patients previously treated with tolterodine ER.
© 2010 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20860717     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09640.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  22 in total

1.  Long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy of fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder symptoms stratified by age: pooled analysis of two open-label extension studies.

Authors:  Peter K Sand; John Heesakkers; Stephen R Kraus; Martin Carlsson; Zhonghong Guan; Sandra Berriman
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Cost effectiveness of fesoterodine and tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder with urge urinary incontinence in Spain and Finland.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Antti Valpas; Javier Rejas; Kari Linden; Marion Kvasz; Sonya J Snedecor
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Adverse events and treatment discontinuations of antimuscarinics for the treatment of overactive bladder in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Scott Martin Vouri; Clark D Kebodeaux; Paul M Stranges; Besu F Teshome
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Management of urinary incontinence.

Authors:  George A Demaagd; Timothy C Davenport
Journal:  P T       Date:  2012-06

5.  Impact of Loss of Work Productivity in Patients with Overactive Bladder Treated with Antimuscarinics in Spain: Study in Routine Clinical Practice Conditions.

Authors:  Antoni Sicras-Mainar; Ruth Navarro-Artieda; Amador Ruiz-Torrejón; Marc Sáez-Zafra; Gabriel Coll-de Tuero
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Comparison of pharmacokinetic variability of fesoterodine vs. tolterodine extended release in cytochrome P450 2D6 extensive and poor metabolizers.

Authors:  Bimal Malhotra; Edress Darsey; Penelope Crownover; Juanzhi Fang; Paul Glue
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Fesoterodine in randomised clinical trials: an updated systematic clinical review of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Chiara Dell'Utri; G Alessandro Digesu; Alka Bhide; Vik Khullar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Review of the efficacy and safety of fesoterodine for treating overactive bladder and urgency urinary incontinence in elderly patients.

Authors:  Adrian Wagg; Matthias Oelke; Javier C Angulo; David Scholfield; Daniel Arumi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Dose and aging effect on patients reported treatment benefit switching from the first overactive bladder therapy with tolterodine ER to fesoterodine: post-hoc analysis from an observational and retrospective study.

Authors:  David Castro-Diaz; Pilar Miranda; Francisco Sanchez-Ballester; Isabel Lizarraga; Daniel Arumí; Javier Rejas
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Overactive bladder, differential diagnosis, and clinical utility of fesoterodine.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Wyndaele
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2012-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.