Literature DB >> 20860692

Efflux pump inhibitor potentiates antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm.

Anil Kishen1, Megha Upadya, George P Tegos, Michael R Hamblin.   

Abstract

Microbial biofilm architecture contains numerous protective features, including extracellular polymeric material that render biofilms impermeable to conventional antimicrobial agents. This study evaluated the efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation (aPDI) of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. The ability of a cationic, phenothiazinium photosensitizer, methylene blue (MB) and an anionic, xanthene photosensitizer, rose bengal (RB) to inactivate biofilms of E. faecalis (OG1RF and FA 2-2) and disrupt the biofilm structure was evaluated. Bacterial cells were tested as planktonic suspensions, intact biofilms and biofilm-derived suspensions obtained by the mechanical disruption of biofilms. The role of a specific microbial efflux pump inhibitor (EPI), verapamil hydrochloride in the MB-mediated aPDI of E. faecalis biofilms was also investigated. The results showed that E. faecalis biofilms exhibited significantly higher resistance to aPDI when compared with E. faecalis in suspension (P < 0.001). aPDI with cationic MB produced superior inactivation of E. faecalis strains in a biofilm along with significant destruction of biofilm structure when compared with anionic RB (P < 0.05). The ability to inactivate biofilm bacteria was further enhanced when the EPI was used with MB (P < 0.001). These experiments demonstrated the advantage of a cationic phenothiazinium photosensitizer combined with an EPI to inactivate biofilm bacteria and disrupt biofilm structure.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation. The American Society of Photobiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20860692      PMCID: PMC2991588          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2010.00792.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  51 in total

1.  From the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  J E Henney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  Keith Poole
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Inactivation of efflux pumps abolishes bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  Malin Kvist; Viktoria Hancock; Per Klemm
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Photodynamic treatment of endodontic polymicrobial infection in vitro.

Authors:  Jacob Lee Fimple; Carla Raquel Fontana; Federico Foschi; Karriann Ruggiero; Xiaoqing Song; Tom C Pagonis; Anne C R Tanner; Ralph Kent; Apostolos G Doukas; Philip P Stashenko; Nikolaos S Soukos
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Simplified agar plate method for quantifying viable bacteria.

Authors:  B D Jett; K L Hatter; M M Huycke; M S Gilmore
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.993

6.  Photobactericidal activity of phenothiazinium dyes against methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M Wainwright; D A Phoenix; S L Laycock; D R Wareing; P A Wright
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  The enterococcal surface protein, Esp, is involved in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation.

Authors:  A Toledo-Arana; J Valle; C Solano; M J Arrizubieta; C Cucarella; M Lamata; B Amorena; J Leiva; J R Penadés; I Lasa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Photoangioplasty: An emerging clinical cardiovascular role for photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  S G Rockson; D P Lorenz; W F Cheong; K W Woodburn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Esp-independent biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Christopher J Kristich; Yung-Hua Li; Dennis G Cvitkovitch; Gary M Dunny
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Comparative antistreptococcal activity of photobactericidal agents.

Authors:  J O'Neill; M Wilson; M Wainwright
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.714

View more
  22 in total

1.  Enhancement of photodynamic inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms by disruptive strategies.

Authors:  Lautaro Gándara; Leandro Mamone; Gabriela Cervini Bohm; Fernanda Buzzola; Adriana Casas
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  Photosensitization reactions in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Bonnie I Kruft; Alexander Greer
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 3.  Photosensitizers in antibacterial photodynamic therapy: an overview.

Authors:  Jaber Ghorbani; Dariush Rahban; Shahin Aghamiri; Alireza Teymouri; Abbas Bahador
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2018-12-31

4.  The Antibacterial Effect of Additional Photodynamic Therapy in Failed Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Asnaashari; Hamed Homayuni; Payam Paymanpour
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-27

Review 5.  Strategies to potentiate antimicrobial photoinactivation by overcoming resistant phenotypes.

Authors:  Domingo Mariano Adolfo Vera; Mark H Haynes; Anthony R Ball; Tianhong Dai; Christos Astrakas; Michael J Kelso; Michael R Hamblin; George P Tegos
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Advances in antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation at the nanoscale.

Authors:  Nasim Kashef; Ying-Ying Huang; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanophotonics       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 8.449

Review 7.  Photodynamic therapy in dentistry: a literature review.

Authors:  Hare Gursoy; Ceyda Ozcakir-Tomruk; Jale Tanalp; Selçuk Yilmaz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  Can microbial cells develop resistance to oxidative stress in antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation?

Authors:  Nasim Kashef; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 18.500

9.  Selective toxicity of rose bengal to ovarian cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  Steven B Koevary
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-25

10.  Effect of gaseous ozone on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Tanja Boch; Christian Tennert; Kirstin Vach; Ali Al-Ahmad; Elmar Hellwig; Olga Polydorou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.