OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed to investigate the relationship between the antiproliferative effects of D-allose and the up-regulation of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) in head and neck cancer cells. METHODS: For the in vitro study, 5 oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines (Ca9-22, HSC-3, HSC-4, SAS, and KON) were treated with 25 mmol/L D-allose. For the in vivo study, HSC-3 cells were used in a xenograft model with female athymic nude mice (BALB/c nu/nu; 5 to 6 weeks old). RESULTS: Inhibition of cell growth by D-allose was noted in HSC-3 and Ca9-22 cells, along with significant induction of TXNIP. Although TXNIP up-regulation was also evident, albeit to a lesser extent, in the remaining cell lines, D-allose did not inhibit their growth. With the HSC-3 line, the cell survival fractions decreased and TXNIP expression increased in a D-allose dose-dependent manner. The antiproliferative effects were partially suppressed by concomitant D-glucose treatment, which also reduced TXNIP expression. In the in vivo experiment, the tumor volume at day 15 after D-allose treatment was reduced to 61% of that of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that D-allose exerts growth inhibitory effects on head and neck cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. The sugar may act as an antiproliferative agent via TXNIP induction and thus may be useful as a novel anticancer drug.
OBJECTIVES: This study was aimed to investigate the relationship between the antiproliferative effects of D-allose and the up-regulation of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) in head and neck cancer cells. METHODS: For the in vitro study, 5 oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines (Ca9-22, HSC-3, HSC-4, SAS, and KON) were treated with 25 mmol/L D-allose. For the in vivo study, HSC-3 cells were used in a xenograft model with female athymic nude mice (BALB/c nu/nu; 5 to 6 weeks old). RESULTS: Inhibition of cell growth by D-allose was noted in HSC-3 and Ca9-22 cells, along with significant induction of TXNIP. Although TXNIP up-regulation was also evident, albeit to a lesser extent, in the remaining cell lines, D-allose did not inhibit their growth. With the HSC-3 line, the cell survival fractions decreased and TXNIP expression increased in a D-allose dose-dependent manner. The antiproliferative effects were partially suppressed by concomitant D-glucose treatment, which also reduced TXNIP expression. In the in vivo experiment, the tumor volume at day 15 after D-allose treatment was reduced to 61% of that of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that D-allose exerts growth inhibitory effects on head and neck cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. The sugar may act as an antiproliferative agent via TXNIP induction and thus may be useful as a novel anticancer drug.