Literature DB >> 20860066

The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements II: a modified Box correction.

Simon S Skene1, Michael G Kenward.   

Abstract

There is a need for appropriate methods for the analysis of very small samples of continuous repeated measurements. A key feature of such analyses is the role played by the covariance matrix of the repeated observations. When subjects are few it can be difficult to assess the fit of parsimonious structures for this matrix, while the use of an unstructured form may lead to a serious lack of power. The Kenward-Roger adjustment is now widely adopted as a means of providing an appropriate inferences in small samples, but does not perform adequately in very small samples. Adjusted tests based on the empirical sandwich estimator can be constructed that have good nominal properties, but are seriously underpowered. Further, when such data are incomplete, or unbalanced, or non-saturated mean models are used, exact distributional results do not exist that justify analyses with any sample size. In this paper, a modification of Box's correction applied to a linear model-based F-statistic is developed for such small sample settings and is shown to have both the required nominal properties and acceptable power across a range of settings for repeated measurements.
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20860066     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

1.  On the analysis of very small samples of Gaussian repeated measurements: an alternative approach.

Authors:  Philip M Westgate; Woodrow W Burchett
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  A Guerilla Guide to Common Problems in 'Neurostatistics': Essential Statistical Topics in Neuroscience.

Authors:  Paul F Smith
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2017-11-15

3.  Estimating the Effect of a Community-Based Intervention with Two Communities.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Maya Petersen; Wenjing Zheng
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2013-05

4.  Empirical evaluation of the implementation of the EMA guideline on missing data in confirmatory clinical trials: Specification of mixed models for longitudinal data in study protocols.

Authors:  Sebastian Häckl; Armin Koch; Florian Lasch
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 1.894

5.  Clinical validity of outcome pain measures in naturally occurring canine osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Pascale Rialland; Sylvain Bichot; Maxim Moreau; Martin Guillot; Bertrand Lussier; Dominique Gauvin; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Eric Troncy
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.741

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.