Literature DB >> 2085981

Pharmacokinetic comparison between fosfomycin and other phosphonic acid derivatives.

T Bergan1.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic comparison of phosphonic acid derivatives is based upon a survey of available literature on the whole group of compounds and on our own studies on fosfomycin. All three clinically used compounds, fosfomycin, fosmidomycin, and alafosfalin, are available for both oral and parenteral administration. The highest bioavailability is observed for the trometamol derivative of fosfomycin (37-44%); the calcium salt of fosfomycin is 2-2.5 times less absorbed and fosmidomycin has a bioavailability of 20-30%. The peak serum concentration of fosfomycin when given as the trometamol salt is about 2 times higher than the one reached with fosfomycin calcium or fosmidomycin. Urine recovery of unchanged drug is comparable after intravenous doses of fosfomycin and fosmidomycin, 80-95%, whereas the figure is only 10-20% for alafosfalin because it is extensively metabolized. After oral administration, urine recovery is highest for fosfomycin trometamol, 35-60%, compared to approximately 25% (range 18-29%) for fosfomycin calcium, 26% for fosmidomycin, and 6-17% for alafosfalin. The serum half-life of fosfomycin is 2-4 h (higher, up to 5.5 h, for some formulations of the calcium salt), 1.5-2.0 h for fosmidomycin, and about 1 h for alafosfalin. Thus, among available phosphonic acid derivatives and formulations, the trometamol derivative of fosfomycin has the most favourable characteristics. This applies to both bioavailability and urinary recovery, while at the same time the medium long half-life renders moderate fluctuation of concentrations whereby longer dosage intervals are possible.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2085981     DOI: 10.1159/000238809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemotherapy        ISSN: 0009-3157            Impact factor:   2.544


  6 in total

1.  Intracellular bactericidal activity of fosfomycin against staphylococci: a comparison with other antibiotics.

Authors:  M Trautmann; C Meincke; K Vogt; M Ruhnke; A M Lajous-Petter
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Fosfomycin: an old, new friend?

Authors:  M Popovic; D Steinort; S Pillai; C Joukhadar
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Combination effect of fosfomycin and ofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa growing in a biofilm.

Authors:  H Kumon; N Ono; M Iida; J C Nickel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Fosfomycin tromethamine. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy as a single-dose oral treatment for acute uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections.

Authors:  S S Patel; J A Balfour; H M Bryson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Fosfomycin: Pharmacological, Clinical and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Anneke Corinne Dijkmans; Natalia Veneranda Ortiz Zacarías; Jacobus Burggraaf; Johan Willem Mouton; Erik Bert Wilms; Cees van Nieuwkoop; Daniel Johannes Touw; Jasper Stevens; Ingrid Maria Catharina Kamerling
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-31

6.  Fosfomycin as a potential therapy for the treatment of systemic infections: a population pharmacokinetic model to simulate multiple dosing regimens.

Authors:  Natalia V Ortiz Zacarías; Anneke C Dijkmans; Jacobus Burggraaf; Johan W Mouton; Erik B Wilms; Cees van Nieuwkoop; Daan J Touw; Ingrid M C Kamerling; Jasper Stevens
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2018-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.