Dear Editor,I read with keen interest the review by Gopal et al. in the journal.[1] I am grateful for their great review. However, I would like to make some comments.First, there are recent reports that demonstrate the superiority of quadruple or triple immunosupression versus traditional approach in terms of efficacy and safety.[2] This positive outcome is mainly related to the use of tacrolimus as the cornerstone within the immunosuppressive treatment.[3]Second, in areas where Chagas disease is endemic, with migratory flows, reactivation should be considered when the donor has Latin-American origin, nowadays this complication has been recognized in USA and Europe.[4-5]Third, the authors missed the important issue that transplant recipients may develop severe infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae, even in the early postransplant period.[6] Vaccination has been recommended in heart, renal and liver recipients. Available vaccines are the 23-valent polysaccharide and the hepta- and decavalent protein conjugate.[7]
Authors: L A C D'Albuquerque; A M Gonzalez; H L V N Filho; J L M Copstein; F I S Larrea; J M P Mansero; G Perón; M A F Ribeiro; A Oliveira e Silva Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: S Jonas; R Neuhaus; G Junge; J Klupp; T Theruvat; J M Langrehr; U Settmacher; P Neuhaus Journal: Int Immunopharmacol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.932
Authors: F F Souza; O Castro-E-Silva; J A Marin Neto; A K Sankarankutty; A C Teixeira; A L C Martinelli; G G Gaspar; L Melo; J F C Figueiredo; M M D Romano; B C Maciel; A D C Passos; M A Rossi Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 1.066