BACKGROUND: Alvimopan has received Food and Drug Administration approval to accelerate the time to upper and lower gastrointestinal recovery following partial large or small bowel resection with primary anastomosis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and economic benefit of alvimopan in patients undergoing open or laparoscopic bowel resection in a community hospital system setting. METHODS: This 6-month, open-label, multi-hospital, prospective study combined with a retrospective chart review compared postoperative length of stay and postoperative ileus-related morbidity (nasogastric tube insertion, hospital readmission) for patients undergoing open or laparoscopic bowel resection who received alvimopan 12 mg (n = 108) versus historical control bowel resection patients (n = 91) who would have been eligible to receive alvimopan. Multivariate analysis assessed the effects of age and surgery type on postoperative length of stay. Additional-day hospital costs were estimated using ordinary least-squares regression to calculate costs based on length of stay in the control cohort. RESULTS: Compared with historical controls, patients receiving alvimopan had a mean 1.8-day shorter postoperative length of stay (p = 0.01) and lower rates of nasogastric tube insertion (2% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction in postoperative length of stay in the alvimopan group of approximately 1.2 days (p = 0.01), regardless of age or surgery type, with an even larger difference (3.2 days) observed in patients ≥70 years old. Mean cost savings associated with alvimopan use ranged from $531 (laparoscopic bowel resection) to $997 (open bowel resection) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with clinical trial data, alvimopan use resulted in an approximately 1 day shorter postoperative length of stay and was associated with substantial cost savings.
BACKGROUND:Alvimopan has received Food and Drug Administration approval to accelerate the time to upper and lower gastrointestinal recovery following partial large or small bowel resection with primary anastomosis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and economic benefit of alvimopan in patients undergoing open or laparoscopic bowel resection in a community hospital system setting. METHODS: This 6-month, open-label, multi-hospital, prospective study combined with a retrospective chart review compared postoperative length of stay and postoperative ileus-related morbidity (nasogastric tube insertion, hospital readmission) for patients undergoing open or laparoscopic bowel resection who received alvimopan 12 mg (n = 108) versus historical control bowel resection patients (n = 91) who would have been eligible to receive alvimopan. Multivariate analysis assessed the effects of age and surgery type on postoperative length of stay. Additional-day hospital costs were estimated using ordinary least-squares regression to calculate costs based on length of stay in the control cohort. RESULTS: Compared with historical controls, patients receiving alvimopan had a mean 1.8-day shorter postoperative length of stay (p = 0.01) and lower rates of nasogastric tube insertion (2% vs 15%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed a statistically significant reduction in postoperative length of stay in the alvimopan group of approximately 1.2 days (p = 0.01), regardless of age or surgery type, with an even larger difference (3.2 days) observed in patients ≥70 years old. Mean cost savings associated with alvimopan use ranged from $531 (laparoscopic bowel resection) to $997 (open bowel resection) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with clinical trial data, alvimopan use resulted in an approximately 1 day shorter postoperative length of stay and was associated with substantial cost savings.
Authors: Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Yuxiang Wen; Murad A Jabir; Michael Keating; Alison R Althans; Justin T Brady; Bradley J Champagne; Conor P Delaney; Scott R Steele Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 4.584