OBJECTIVES: We previously reported vicriviroc (VCV) resistance in an HIV-infected subject and used deep sequencing and clonal analyses to track the evolution of V3 sequence forms over 28 weeks of therapy. Here, we test the contribution of gp120 mutations to CCR5 antagonist resistance and investigate why certain minority V3 variants emerged as the dominant species under drug pressure. METHODS: Nineteen site-directed HIV-1 mutants were generated that contained gp120 VCV resistance mutations. Viral sensitivities to VCV, maraviroc, TAK-779, and HGS004 were determined. RESULTS: Three patterns of susceptibilities were observed as follows: sigmoid inhibition curves with 50% inhibitory concentration similar to pretreatment virus [07J-week 0 (W0)], single mutants with decreased 50% inhibitory concentrations compared with 07J-W0, and mutants that contained ≥5 of 7 VCV resistance mutations with flattened inhibition curves and decreased or negative percent maximal inhibition. Substitutions such as S306P, which sensitized virus to CCR5 antagonists when present as single mutations, were not detected in the baseline virus population but were necessary for maximal resistance when incorporated into V3 backbones that included preexisting VCV resistance mutations. CONCLUSIONS: CCR5 antagonist resistance was reproduced only when a majority of V3 mutations were present. Minority V3 loop variants may serve as a scaffold upon which additional mutations lead to complete VCV resistance.
OBJECTIVES: We previously reported vicriviroc (VCV) resistance in an HIV-infected subject and used deep sequencing and clonal analyses to track the evolution of V3 sequence forms over 28 weeks of therapy. Here, we test the contribution of gp120 mutations to CCR5 antagonist resistance and investigate why certain minority V3 variants emerged as the dominant species under drug pressure. METHODS: Nineteen site-directed HIV-1 mutants were generated that contained gp120VCV resistance mutations. Viral sensitivities to VCV, maraviroc, TAK-779, and HGS004 were determined. RESULTS: Three patterns of susceptibilities were observed as follows: sigmoid inhibition curves with 50% inhibitory concentration similar to pretreatment virus [07J-week 0 (W0)], single mutants with decreased 50% inhibitory concentrations compared with 07J-W0, and mutants that contained ≥5 of 7 VCV resistance mutations with flattened inhibition curves and decreased or negative percent maximal inhibition. Substitutions such as S306P, which sensitized virus to CCR5 antagonists when present as single mutations, were not detected in the baseline virus population but were necessary for maximal resistance when incorporated into V3 backbones that included preexisting VCV resistance mutations. CONCLUSIONS:CCR5 antagonist resistance was reproduced only when a majority of V3 mutations were present. Minority V3 loop variants may serve as a scaffold upon which additional mutations lead to complete VCV resistance.
Authors: Johanna Repits; Monica Öberg; Joakim Esbjörnsson; Patrik Medstrand; Anders Karlsson; Jan Albert; Eva Maria Fenyö; Marianne Jansson Journal: J Gen Virol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.891
Authors: Mike Westby; Caroline Smith-Burchnell; Julie Mori; Marilyn Lewis; Michael Mosley; Mark Stockdale; Patrick Dorr; Giuseppe Ciaramella; Manos Perros Journal: J Virol Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Pavel Pugach; Andre J Marozsan; Thomas J Ketas; Elissa L Landes; John P Moore; Shawn E Kuhmann Journal: Virology Date: 2006-12-12 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Roy M Gulick; Zhaohui Su; Charles Flexner; Michael D Hughes; Paul R Skolnik; Timothy J Wilkin; Robert Gross; Amy Krambrink; Eoin Coakley; Wayne L Greaves; Andrew Zolopa; Richard Reichman; Catherine Godfrey; Martin Hirsch; Daniel R Kuritzkes Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2007-06-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Thomas J Ketas; Shawn E Kuhmann; Ashley Palmer; Juan Zurita; Weijing He; Sunil K Ahuja; Per Johan Klasse; John P Moore Journal: Virology Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Dirk Schürmann; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Jacques Reynes; Christian Michelet; Francois Raffi; Jan van Lier; Maria Caceres; Anther Keung; Angela Sansone-Parsons; Lisa M Dunkle; Christian Hoffmann Journal: AIDS Date: 2007-06-19 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Timothy J Henrich; Nicolas R P Lewine; Sun-Hee Lee; Suhas S P Rao; Reem Berro; Roy M Gulick; John P Moore; Athe M N Tsibris; Daniel R Kuritzkes Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Timothy J Henrich; Emily Hanhauser; Zixin Hu; Hans-Jürgen Stellbrink; Christian Noah; Jeffrey N Martin; Steven G Deeks; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Florencia Pereyra Journal: AIDS Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Athe M N Tsibris; Zixin Hu; Roger Paredes; Kay E Leopold; Opass Putcharoen; Allison L Schure; Natalie Mazur; Eoin Coakley; Zhaohui Su; Roy M Gulick; Daniel R Kuritzkes Journal: J Virol Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Opass Putcharoen; Sun Hee Lee; Timothy J Henrich; Zixin Hu; Jakapat Vanichanan; Eoin Coakley; Wayne Greaves; Roy M Gulick; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Athe M N Tsibris Journal: J Virol Date: 2011-11-16 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Timothy J Henrich; Zixin Hu; Jonathan Z Li; Gaia Sciaranghella; Michael P Busch; Sheila M Keating; Sebastien Gallien; Nina H Lin; Francoise F Giguel; Laura Lavoie; Vincent T Ho; Philippe Armand; Robert J Soiffer; Manish Sagar; Ann S Lacasce; Daniel R Kuritzkes Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Michael Roche; Hamid Salimi; Renee Duncan; Brendan L Wilkinson; Kelechi Chikere; Miranda S Moore; Nicholas E Webb; Helena Zappi; Jasminka Sterjovski; Jacqueline K Flynn; Anne Ellett; Lachlan R Gray; Benhur Lee; Becky Jubb; Mike Westby; Paul A Ramsland; Sharon R Lewin; Richard J Payne; Melissa J Churchill; Paul R Gorry Journal: Retrovirology Date: 2013-04-20 Impact factor: 4.602