Literature DB >> 20855825

Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

Angelo Di Leo1, Guy Jerusalem, Lubos Petruzelka, Roberto Torres, Igor N Bondarenko, Rustem Khasanov, Didier Verhoeven, José L Pedrini, Iya Smirnova, Mikhail R Lichinitser, Kelly Pendergrass, Sally Garnett, Justin P O Lindemann, Francisco Sapunar, Miguel Martin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared fulvestrant 500 mg regimen with the approved dose of fulvestrant 250 mg per month for treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer who experienced progression after prior endocrine therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comparison of Faslodex in Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (CONFIRM) is a double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, phase III study. Patients were randomly assigned to fulvestrant 500 mg (500 mg intramuscularly [IM] on day 0, then 500 mg IM on days 14 and 28 and every 28 days thereafter) or 250 mg every 28 days. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate, clinical benefit rate (CBR), duration of clinical benefit (DoCB), overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QOL).
RESULTS: PFS was significantly longer for fulvestrant 500 mg (n = 362) than 250 mg (n = 374) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.94; P = .006), corresponding to a 20% reduction in risk of progression. Objective response rate was similar for fulvestrant 500 mg and 250 mg (9.1% v 10.2%, respectively). CBR was 45.6% for fulvestrant 500 mg and 39.6% for fulvestrant 250 mg. DoCB and OS were 16.6 and 25.1 months, respectively, for the 500-mg group, whereas DoCB and OS were 13.9 and 22.8 months, respectively, in the 250-mg group. Fulvestrant 500 mg was well tolerated with no dose-dependent adverse events. QOL was similar for both arms.
CONCLUSION: Fulvestrant 500 mg was associated with a statistically significant increase in PFS and not associated with increased toxicity, corresponding to a clinically meaningful improvement in benefit versus risk compared with fulvestrant 250 mg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20855825     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.8415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  175 in total

1.  Targeting the estrogen pathway for the treatment and prevention of lung cancer.

Authors:  Timothy F Burns; Laura P Stabile
Journal:  Lung Cancer Manag       Date:  2014-02-01

2.  Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  AGO Recommendations for Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. Update 2011.

Authors:  Christoph Thomssen; Anton Scharl; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Advanced and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Update 2015.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Marc Thill; Volker Hanf; Florian Schuütz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  Metastatic breast cancer: The Odyssey of personalization.

Authors:  A Sonnenblick; N Pondé; M Piccart
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  Safety and efficacy of everolimus (EVE) plus exemestane (EXE) in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: final results from EVEREXES.

Authors:  Young-Hyuck Im; Bulent Karabulut; Keun Seok Lee; Byeong-Woo Park; Aditya Adhav; Havva Yesil Cinkir; Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Yuan-Ching Chang; Sercan Aksoy; Seock-Ah Im; Joon Jeong; Yeesoo Chae; James Bowles; Khemaies Slimane; Hongling Xue; Sung-Bae Kim
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  The sequential use of endocrine treatment for advanced breast cancer: where are we?

Authors:  C Barrios; J F Forbes; W Jonat; P Conte; W Gradishar; A Buzdar; K Gelmon; M Gnant; J Bonneterre; M Toi; C Hudis; J F R Robertson
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography reveals differences in pharmacodynamics of aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, and fulvestrant in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Hannah M Linden; Brenda F Kurland; Lanell M Peterson; Erin K Schubert; Julie R Gralow; Jennifer M Specht; Georgiana K Ellis; Thomas J Lawton; Robert B Livingston; Philip H Petra; Jeanne M Link; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment for breast cancer: from bedside to bench and back again?

Authors:  R R Saleh; N Bouganim; J Hilton; A Arnaout; M Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Bazedoxifene exhibits antiestrogenic activity in animal models of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: implications for treatment of advanced disease.

Authors:  Suzanne E Wardell; Erik R Nelson; Christina A Chao; Donald P McDonnell
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.