PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Delirium is a widespread concern for hospitalized seniors, yet is often unrecognized. A comprehensive and sequential intervention (CSI) aiming to effect change in clinician behavior by improving knowledge about delirium was tested. DESIGN AND METHODS: A 2-day CSI program that consisted of progressive 4-part didactic series, including evidence-based reviews of delirium recognition, prevention, and management, interspersed with interactive small group sessions and practical case conferences was conceptualized in consultation with a leading expert on delirium. Pretest and posttest instruments were designed to test the attendees on their knowledge and confidence around delirium identification. RESULTS: An average of 71 people attended each didactic session. Among all responses, 50 pretests and posttests were matched based on numeric coding (6 MD/DOs, 34 RNs, and 10 others). Mean pretest and posttest scores were 7.9 and 10.8 points, respectively (maximum: 17), showing a positive change in knowledge scores after the intervention (2.9 points, p < .001). Improvement in knowledge scores was higher in the cohort attending 2 or more lectures (3.8 points, p < .001) compared with those attending only 1 lecture (1.3 points, p < .12). Confidence in identifying patients with delirium increased by 28% (p < .001), and self-assessed capacity to correctly administer the Confusion Assessment Method increased by 36% (p < .001). IMPLICATIONS: A novel CSI increased clinician knowledge about delirium identification and management and improved confidence and self-assessed capacity to identify delirium in the hospitalized elderly patients. This strategy, which incorporates multiple reinforcing modes of education, may ultimately be more effective in influencing clinician behavior when compared with traditional grand rounds.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Delirium is a widespread concern for hospitalized seniors, yet is often unrecognized. A comprehensive and sequential intervention (CSI) aiming to effect change in clinician behavior by improving knowledge about delirium was tested. DESIGN AND METHODS: A 2-day CSI program that consisted of progressive 4-part didactic series, including evidence-based reviews of delirium recognition, prevention, and management, interspersed with interactive small group sessions and practical case conferences was conceptualized in consultation with a leading expert on delirium. Pretest and posttest instruments were designed to test the attendees on their knowledge and confidence around delirium identification. RESULTS: An average of 71 people attended each didactic session. Among all responses, 50 pretests and posttests were matched based on numeric coding (6 MD/DOs, 34 RNs, and 10 others). Mean pretest and posttest scores were 7.9 and 10.8 points, respectively (maximum: 17), showing a positive change in knowledge scores after the intervention (2.9 points, p < .001). Improvement in knowledge scores was higher in the cohort attending 2 or more lectures (3.8 points, p < .001) compared with those attending only 1 lecture (1.3 points, p < .12). Confidence in identifying patients with delirium increased by 28% (p < .001), and self-assessed capacity to correctly administer the Confusion Assessment Method increased by 36% (p < .001). IMPLICATIONS: A novel CSI increased clinician knowledge about delirium identification and management and improved confidence and self-assessed capacity to identify delirium in the hospitalized elderly patients. This strategy, which incorporates multiple reinforcing modes of education, may ultimately be more effective in influencing clinician behavior when compared with traditional grand rounds.
Authors: Elizabeth H Bradley; Eric S Holmboe; Jennifer A Mattera; Sarah A Roumanis; Martha J Radford; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: J Healthc Manag Date: 2003 Jan-Feb
Authors: Marcia M Ward; Thomas E Vaughn; Tanya Uden-Holman; Bradley N Doebbeling; William R Clarke; Robert F Woolson Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: S K Inouye; S T Bogardus; P A Charpentier; L Leo-Summers; D Acampora; T R Holford; L M Cooney Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-03-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Robert A Greene; Howard Beckman; John Chamberlain; Greg Partridge; Marla Miller; Diane Burden; Jamie Kerr Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Sharon A Levine; Belle Brett; Bruce E Robinson; Georgette A Stratos; Steven M Lascher; Lisa Granville; Carol Goodwin; Kathel Dunn; Patricia P Barry Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Shirley H Bush; Pamela A Grassau; Michelle N Yarmo; Tinghua Zhang; Samantha J Zinkie; José L Pereira Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Kenneth T Shelton; Jason Qu; Federico Bilotta; Emery N Brown; Gaston Cudemus; David A D'Alessandro; Hao Deng; Alan DiBiasio; Jacob A Gitlin; Eunice Y Hahm; Lauren E Hobbs; Timothy T Houle; Reine Ibala; Marco L Loggia; Kara J Pavone; Shahzad Shaefi; George Tolis; M Brandon Westover; Oluwaseun Akeju Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: T S Wildes; A C Winter; H R Maybrier; A M Mickle; E J Lenze; S Stark; N Lin; S K Inouye; E M Schmitt; S L McKinnon; M R Muench; M R Murphy; R T Upadhyayula; B A Fritz; K E Escallier; G P Apakama; D A Emmert; T J Graetz; T W Stevens; B J Palanca; R Hueneke; S Melby; B Torres; J M Leung; E Jacobsohn; M S Avidan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Alain Deschamps; Tarit Saha; Renée El-Gabalawy; Eric Jacobsohn; Charles Overbeek; Jennifer Palermo; Sophie Robichaud; Andrea Alicia Dumont; George Djaiani; Jo Carroll; Morvarid S Kavosh; Rob Tanzola; Eva M Schmitt; Sharon K Inouye; Jordan Oberhaus; Angela Mickle; Arbi Ben Abdallah; Michael S Avidan; Canadian Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials Group Journal: F1000Res Date: 2019-07-23