Literature DB >> 20855561

An effective method for controlling false discovery and false nondiscovery rates in genome-scale RNAi screens.

Xiaohua Douglas Zhang1.   

Abstract

In most genome-scale RNA interference (RNAi) screens, the ultimate goal is to select siRNAs with a large inhibition or activation effect. The selection of hits typically requires statistical control of 2 errors: false positives and false negatives. Traditional methods of controlling false positives and false negatives do not take into account the important feature in RNAi screens: many small-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) may have very small but real nonzero average effects on the measured response and thus cannot allow us to effectively control false positives and false negatives. To address for deficiencies in the application of traditional approaches in RNAi screening, the author proposes a new method for controlling false positives and false negatives in RNAi high-throughput screens. The false negatives are statistically controlled through a false-negative rate (FNR) or false nondiscovery rate (FNDR). FNR is the proportion of false negatives among all siRNAs examined, whereas FNDR is the proportion of false negatives among declared nonhits. The author also proposes new concepts, q*-value and p*-value, to control FNR and FNDR, respectively. The proposed method should have broad utility for hit selection in which one needs to control both false discovery and false nondiscovery rates in genome-scale RNAi screens in a robust manner.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20855561     DOI: 10.1177/1087057110381783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Screen        ISSN: 1087-0571


  7 in total

Review 1.  RNAi screening: new approaches, understandings, and organisms.

Authors:  Stephanie E Mohr; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.957

2.  cSSMD: assessing collective activity for addressing off-target effects in genome-scale RNA interference screens.

Authors:  Xiaohua Douglas Zhang; Francesca Santini; Raul Lacson; Shane D Marine; Qian Wu; Luca Benetti; Ruojing Yang; Alex McCampbell; Joel P Berger; Dawn M Toolan; Erica M Stec; Daniel J Holder; Keith A Soper; Joseph F Heyse; Marc Ferrer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  A genome-wide RNAi screening method to discover novel genes involved in virus infection.

Authors:  Debasis Panda; Sara Cherry
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.608

4.  GUItars: a GUI tool for analysis of high-throughput RNA interference screening data.

Authors:  Asli N Goktug; Su Sien Ong; Taosheng Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A High-Content Larval Zebrafish Brain Imaging Method for Small Molecule Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Harrison Liu; Steven Chen; Kevin Huang; Jeffrey Kim; Han Mo; Raffael Iovine; Julie Gendre; Pauline Pascal; Qiang Li; Yaping Sun; Zhiqiang Dong; Michelle Arkin; Su Guo; Bo Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Network-Guided Discovery of Influenza Virus Replication Host Factors.

Authors:  Jason E Shoemaker; Yoshihiro Kawaoka; Emily E Ackerman; Eiryo Kawakami; Manami Katoh; Tokiko Watanabe; Shinji Watanabe; Yuriko Tomita; Tiago J Lopes; Yukiko Matsuoka; Hiroaki Kitano
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 7.867

7.  Classification of Sputum Sounds Using Artificial Neural Network and Wavelet Transform.

Authors:  Yan Shi; Guoliang Wang; Jinglong Niu; Qimin Zhang; Maolin Cai; Baoqing Sun; Dandan Wang; Mei Xue; Xiaohua Douglas Zhang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 6.580

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.